"A vampire in love with a slayer. It's rather poetic...in a maudlin sort of way."
May 05
2012
Look who's related: Joss Whedon and Eliza Dushku.
The genealogy website Geni.com has listed how Joss and Eliza are related to each other. There are also a few other famous personalities in Joss' family tree.
adastra
| General
| 08:02 CET
|
14 comments total
| tags:
You need to
log in to be able to post comments.
About
membership.
« Older
(SPOILER)
USA Today assembles the core four ...
|
(SPOILER)
Discuss 'The Avengers' - round fou...
Newer »
© 2002 - 2009 - WHEDONesque.com
(
e-mail)
Individual posts are copyright their respective authors
This is a non-profit, unofficial website, not affiliated with Mutant Enemy, Inc., 20th Century Fox, Warner Brothers or UPN.
crystalsinger | May 05, 09:13 CET
Jaymii | May 05, 09:20 CET
Jackal | May 05, 10:36 CET
eddy | May 05, 11:57 CET
Some things are better not known... ;)
Darkness | May 05, 13:27 CET
eddy | May 05, 15:10 CET
Five Horizons | May 05, 15:28 CET
Although Rasmussen is a common name here, I have quite a few of them among my ancestors - which does make me distantly related to a certain war-mongering former Danish prime minister. Eliza would be better.
Of course, geni.com also claims that "Eneid Capuir ap Cerwyd, Druid King of Britons is your 56th great grandfather", so...
Kaneda | May 05, 16:55 CET
And the "lifetime" membership? Is over $400! No way.
And I was having trouble following their "tree" - the way it looked they went back and back in Joss's tree and suddenly forward into Eliza's, but since there were no years it was hard to tell when they started to come forward again.
Very confusing, misleading site. But if Joss and Eliza truly are cousins, that's awesome.
ShadowQuest | May 05, 17:14 CET
Nebula1400 | May 05, 17:37 CET
However, I have a credit card that's being replaced in a week, so I can easily supply the details to them for the 14 day trial. Then I'll just export it if my family wants the more likely stuff at the bottom of the tree.
Anyway, they start changing direction at Joe Babcock Sr. in 1646. The calculation is sound, if the connections are actually true - which, again, they're most likely not.
After setting up connections I know to be true (then others have done the rest), it's telling me that Eliza is my 24th cousin thrice removed. Which is just about infinitely distant. Joss, however: 27th cousin once removed - going back to a shared ancestor born in 960. ;-)
ETA: 26th actually, but who's counting?
[ edited by Kaneda on 2012-05-05 18:22 ]
Kaneda | May 05, 18:09 CET
newcj | May 05, 19:21 CET
Also, the "big tree" (of which Joss & Eliza are part) is definitely creepy. It goes back to Charlemagne (he IS your x-teeth grandfather) to Jesus to Caesar and -yes, honestly- to Adam and Eve. That's a pretty good reason why I never linked my family tree on there to the "big tree". I still read their blog feed for amusing posts like the one above though.
adastra | May 05, 19:42 CET
Ashley | May 06, 00:44 CET