"Well he doesn't traditionally bring presents so much as you know, disembowel children."
July 05
2012
Is Juliet Starling this generation's Slayer?
More than likely not, but the article tries to make a case for it.
Simon
| BtVS
| 06:47 CET
|
23 comments total
| tags: juliet starling
You need to
log in to be able to post comments.
About
membership.
« Older
Marvel Phase One Boxset release da...
|
'The Avengers theme' violin cover.
Newer »
© 2002 - 2009 - WHEDONesque.com
(
e-mail)
Individual posts are copyright their respective authors
This is a non-profit, unofficial website, not affiliated with Mutant Enemy, Inc., 20th Century Fox, Warner Brothers or UPN.
The One True b!X | July 05, 06:59 CET
daylight | July 05, 09:44 CET
hallow | July 05, 10:50 CET
Also, the article seemed to use 'sexism' and 'misogyny' interchangeably.
Bluelark | July 05, 11:39 CET
redeem147 | July 05, 12:24 CET
-EDIT I didnt watch the vid until now. I didn't know they were acting.
[ edited by Skytteflickan88 on 2012-07-05 13:09 ]
Skytteflickan88 | July 05, 12:41 CET
LadyJay | July 05, 12:58 CET
I don't know if Buffy is this generation's Buffy, though, because... well, Season 7's 10th anniversary would start this fall. Perhaps if the comics weren't so often pilloried by the ostensible "Buffy" audience, or a vocal part of it, it would feel more present, but "this generation's 'Buffy'" will probably be whatever version of "Buffy" brings its existing audience into the moment while capturing a new audience. The DVD sets one person at a time aren't going to do that, and ultimately as (mostly) fond as I am of it, a few dozen thousand comics a month aren't going to, either.
KingofCretins | July 05, 13:31 CET
Kairos | July 05, 14:32 CET
KingofCretins | July 05, 14:46 CET
Whedonage | July 05, 16:21 CET
Big difference between making a well-rounded, complex character who happens to be beautiful and taking a walking one-dimensional male fantasy and trying to cram a personality in to keep from getting raked over the coals.
skynet_00101 | July 05, 17:08 CET
[ edited by BlueEyedBrigadier on 2012-07-05 18:13 ]
BlueEyedBrigadier | July 05, 18:13 CET
Simon | July 05, 18:24 CET
The One True b!X | July 05, 18:35 CET
I will nitpick the 100% female while writing complaint though. I believe the point was poorly expressed, but essentially means what most writers would actually say which is "I completely understand my characters regardless of sex." And I'm not going to get hung up on it any more than the implication Whedon, Espenson, Ephron, or Brooks understand the people they write. That's what writers do. If they can't, they're usually not particularly successful.
In general, I'd prefer people didn't "compare" things until after a little bit of time. It's hard for something to be the next "Buffy" when a majority of the population is just aware of the advertising at this point.
[ edited by azzers on 2012-07-05 19:55 ]
azzers | July 05, 19:36 CET
Erbine | July 05, 20:48 CET
The games press did. There was a bit of the old deliberate "is this the new Buffy?" coming from the usual PR suspects to boost interest before the game shipped.
Simon | July 05, 21:41 CET
I'd be more willing to accept this "Juliet Starling" character as empowering as soon as I see a non-sexy female protagonist in a video game. Right now, I think sexiness is unfortunately a necessary quality for female video game characters to have.
Like With Pie | July 06, 02:31 CET
This article alone kind of made my uncomfortable. There's a huge difference between being a woman who is sexual/sexy and being a sex object. And this here video game character is a sex object. You can not claim to be a feminist and dress a woman that way, have her act that way and/or put that much emphasis on 'how sexy she is'.
And what is with the lollipop thing? Why is eating a lollipop suddenly inherently sexual. Good grief, I never thought I'd have to tell other people this, but get your head out of the gutter! When Buffy ate a lollipop, I hardly remember it being about anything more than eating candy.
Mitholas | July 06, 03:15 CET
redeem147 | July 06, 04:04 CET
Watching that commercial with the actors, I think people are skating past where the moral of the story is "horny, exploitative wankers will end up being chopped up with a chainsaw". It reminded me of PG Porn.
From what I've seen of this, I could actually accept the premise that -- as a blank state of mythological starting points -- Juliet Starling actually seems quite a bit of early Buffy; cavalier, exultant, and witty, a comedic juxtaposition of teenage banality with warrior prowess and mythic destiny. It's just that there is little chance that this game is going to push that character in anything like the thematic directions Buffy herself was pushed in.
KingofCretins | July 06, 04:06 CET
The comments are supposed to be sarcastic and funny, but aren't. And Tara Strong's voice is grating after a few minutes.
There's nothing original or clever about the game; it is entirely designed for the male gaze. This http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OneChanbara:_Bikini_Zombie_Slayers looks more interesting, and the ratings on it are pretty low.
darkling | July 06, 07:27 CET