February 14 2004
First official Angel petition
So far, it's got 500 sigs.
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.
This site will work and look better in a browser that supports web standards, but it is accessible to any browser or Internet device.

RavenU | February 14, 07:13 CET
NOLA64 | February 14, 07:21 CET
nychick | February 14, 07:21 CET
EdDantes | February 14, 07:46 CET
SpikeBad | February 14, 07:52 CET
[ edited by riaspark17 on 2004-02-14 05:58 ]
[ edited by riaspark17 on 2004-02-14 10:25 ]
riaspark17 | February 14, 07:57 CET
BlindHawkeyes | February 14, 08:13 CET
nychick | February 14, 08:42 CET
nicoblu710 | February 14, 08:45 CET
phlebotinin | February 14, 08:46 CET
tvmoobunny | February 14, 09:01 CET
lalaa | February 14, 09:05 CET
tvmoobunny | February 14, 09:07 CET
nychick | February 14, 09:29 CET
RavenU | February 14, 10:09 CET
nychick | February 14, 11:52 CET
xander fan | February 14, 11:56 CET
zeitgeist | February 14, 14:46 CET
I am an Angel fan who will occasionally watch another WB show here and there out of curiosity. However, Angel is the one WB show I am passionate about. If it is not going to be there anymore, I won’t be so interested in their other programming. I know there are several other fans, who feel the same way.
That is the best way I know to represent what us fans think of Angel and the WB. I agree, however, that it is important we take this other places.
G Thing | February 14, 18:32 CET
Anybody else think that instead of targeting the WB we should be sending words of encouragement to UPN?
DarqueGuy | February 14, 20:06 CET
When is Joss going to make a statement, what he's planning on doing with Angel, is he going to shop it around, are UPN interested, is bhe planning a spinoff.
Ghost Spike | February 14, 20:33 CET
Coll | February 14, 21:03 CET
Darko | February 14, 21:18 CET
Coll | February 14, 21:32 CET
punkinpuss | February 14, 22:35 CET
RavenU | February 14, 23:09 CET
Also requested the same song on the TRL website: http://www.mtv.com/onair/trl/vote/
If enough request of that manner is garnered, I'm sure it's bound to be mentioned on the air.
[ edited by nychick on 2004-02-14 21:33 ]
nychick | February 14, 23:27 CET
Scott | February 15, 01:43 CET
RavenU | February 15, 08:05 CET
[ edited by SaveAngel on 2005-03-03 07:28 ]
Whedonage | February 15, 11:19 CET
Whedonage | February 15, 11:38 CET
but of course we're up against an american tv network, so dealing with the stupid and souless requires more varied tactics especially, as you mention, hand written letters to the dumbass in charge.
t r a c y | February 15, 12:03 CET
Last I checked, some Holocaust Denier was posting spam up there.
So you see, the number is meaningless.
Incidentally, Jordan Levin is probably not a "dumbass" -- here's his profile on UTexas@Austin from where he (and I!) graduated: http://communication.utexas.edu/alumni/outst_alumni/levin.html
"Jordan Levin joined The WB Network in 1994 as its first Head of Comedy Development and Current Programming. As the new network grew into prominence, so did Mr. Levin’s career,culminating with his appointment as the network’s President of Entertainment in June 2001, at the age of 33."
That makes me feel rather loser-ish, as I just turned 33 and I'm not the President of at any television network.
Whedonage | February 15, 13:05 CET
so what if levin was a network prez by the age of 33. have you ever met a network executive...? not the brightest or most creative bunch by a long shot. nothing on their minds but the bottom line and that doesn't take much intelligence. money smarts yes, intelligence no.
seriously no need to feel loserish, good grief. there are a million better things to do with your ambition and having a time table for yourself will only get in the way of your personal progress.
[ edited by t r a c y on 2004-02-15 17:25 ]
t r a c y | February 15, 19:16 CET
Apologies in advance for what will become a very long-winded reply.
I was being facetious. I don't feel loserish: I have my own business, but it's not some hipster television network, even one commonly known as that "network that's better than UPN." (My posting might give you a clue as to just what I do, however.)
Levin is a very bright guy; he graduated cum laude with honors from UT's RTF program. He was Director of Comedy Development at Disney/Touchstone's Television division when he was still in his early 20s. He knows what it takes to make it -- and bottom line is a big part, but not the only part. He supports quality programming-- especially in genres-- so long as it earn their keep. I can't say I care for Charmed, but it's the network's third highest rated show (behind Smallville and 7th Heaven.) He rightly kicked Birds of Prey and Tarzan to the curb. And he later admitted, if euphemistically, it was because they were sucky.
Levin's been a supporter of Angel, but it's near the basement of the ratings, which means they can't get high-advo-dollars, no matter how good the stories are. Part of that— and Levin has rightly pointed this out— is the danger of extended story arcs making a series like Angel inaccessible to new viewers. If you need a 2-3 minute opening recap of the plot to make sense of it, then the arc is too convoluted. Whedon & Co. promised to pull back from this kind of storytelling but chose not to. This was a similar problem with the well-written but confusing SciFi show Farscape -- and it got cancelled four seasons out, when it's numbers didn't improve. (But a scrappy bunch of fans were able to successfully resurrect it as a miniseries.)
And the network is getting itchy. Recently The WB's been going through a downtick in the youth demo; part of it has to do with a change in the way the Nielsens are measuring viewership (which has all the networks miffed) but also it's that the "Frog" has lost some of its key youth shows, such as last year's end of Dawson's Creek.
If you want to see Angel continue -- you have to demonstate it makes financial sense, not just emotional. There's some good data to support the view that Angel is holding its own, and may even be picking up viewers in the sought after Male 18-34 demo. That's the point to hammer home with the execs, and to raise doubt about the efficacy of the new Nielsen methodology.
As for Petitiononline.com: the site is a joke -- a sad one. There's absolutely zero credibility in online petitions like this. I went on there and entered a dozen times. What's to stop someone with a lot of time, and will to enter hundreds if not thousands of times? It may make you feel better to write something up there, but a made-up numbers has no value to corporate decision-maker.
all the best,
-s
Whedonage | February 15, 20:28 CET
RavenU | February 15, 20:49 CET
Scott | February 16, 01:27 CET
tvmoobunny | February 16, 05:01 CET
bunnyofthekungfu | February 16, 09:44 CET
BlindHawkeyes | February 16, 12:23 CET
jennicole | February 17, 00:45 CET