September 27
2012
Deconstructing Joss Whedon's most (in)famous trope.
A very interesting look at the role death plays in Joss Whedon's work.
xanderharris
| General
| 18:16 CET
|
27 comments total
| tags: joss whedon
You need to
log in to be able to post comments.
About
membership.
« Older
Avengers opening credits, Buffy st...
|
Nine fun facts from Joss Whedon's ...
Newer »
© 2002 - 2009 - WHEDONesque.com
(
e-mail)
Individual posts are copyright their respective authors
This is a non-profit, unofficial website, not affiliated with Mutant Enemy, Inc., 20th Century Fox, Warner Brothers or UPN.
Simon | September 27, 18:29 CET
The point of there being no male victimized deaths is a compelling one. However, I'm tempted to classify Wash's death as a murder rather than a "Killed in Action," if only because his piloting didn't involve combat and his death came right after the action.
Like With Pie | September 27, 19:05 CET
Otherwise, an interesting article, though I'm not sure I agree with his points about women's victimization; or his unfathomable love for Anya. ;)
Mr. E | September 27, 19:16 CET
Also, I think my favorite part of that article is the manner of Fred's death: "complications due to godhood."
aftertherockets | September 27, 19:59 CET
In short, stupid, baseless, self-reinforcing meme is stupid.
Yoink | September 27, 20:12 CET
PaperSpock | September 27, 20:12 CET
Wesbi | September 27, 20:30 CET
gianetta | September 27, 20:52 CET
Didn't like how it dealt with Anya's death, didn't like the categorization, didn't think it delved deep enough into purpose for death. It it claims to be "deconstructing" something, it shouldn't just tear off a couple hunks, and give the statistics on those, while leaving the structure as a whole largely intact. Metaphor over, now. Some interesting bits, but needed a lot more content.
Can we just get over the "Joss kills people" thing already? Yeah. He does. And it's emotional. And purposeful. And so does everybody else.
wasabi17 | September 27, 21:02 CET
Also, I wish people who wrote these things would get their facts right. Joyce's death had nothing to do with Dawn or the spell the monks cast and Anya was killed by a Bringer, not a vampire.
Edited to add: if you haven't seen "Cabin in the Woods" yet, don't read the comments section on this link. There is a major spoiler in there. :(
[ edited by menomegirl on 2012-09-27 23:10 ]
menomegirl | September 27, 21:38 CET
(Though I would consider Book's death a murder, since the Operative notes that if you go to ground, you can give no ground; you remove all places your enemy could go. It is just not premeditated).
Dana5140 | September 27, 22:33 CET
Where on Earth did the idea that Dawn's creation caused Joyce's death come from? That's a fanwank right?
So now I feel like this piece just wasn't worth the time.
[ edited by hann23 on 2012-09-28 00:15 ]
hann23 | September 28, 00:12 CET
Dana5140 | September 28, 00:17 CET
Probably mostly from "No Place Like Home"--it is what Buffy thinks she's discovered from her trance-vision-thing. Of course, it is made pretty clear that she's adding 2 and 2 and getting 5, but the idea is floated in the series. The "DNA" thing does seem to be entirely extracanonical, though. Dawn is made of "Summers blood" but I don't recall any suggestion that Joyce was sacrificed to "make" Dawn--and I don't think Buffy's substitution for Dawn in "The Gift" makes sense if we do entertain the idea.
Yoink | September 28, 00:20 CET
Far more disturbing is the idea that Joyce's death is a form of murder by rape (as are Fred's and Mellie's according to the writer). "They’re all connected thematically to loss of personal control ....The violence in these deaths is abundantly precent (sic), it just happens to be metaphorical. Not only did Joyce have no choice in the matter of Dawn’s creation, the male monk’s who created her “daughter” never asked and wouldn’t have taken NO for answer, anyway."
I know there are a lot of people who considered Dawn a whiny pain in the butt, but I'm not sure inflicting her on Joyce really constituted violence - especially when Joyce considered Dawn her little pumpkinhead. No, Joyce didn't get a chance to say "no" to Dawn. As it happens, Buffy didn't get a chance to say "no" to being the Slayer. Giles didn't get a chance to say "no" to being a Watcher. Xander didn't get the chance to say "no" to having his eye poked out. There were a lot of bad things that happened to people in the Whedonverse that they didn't have the opportunity to say "no" to. That does not make all of them some form of rape.
I think the author does have the thread of an interesting idea of looking at the different ways men and women do get victimized in the Whedonverse. But that thread gets tangled pretty quickly in his own hands.
barboo | September 28, 00:42 CET
guardian_owl | September 28, 04:29 CET
Didn't Anya die because she Emma was the only one with no interest in doing a spin-off? I'd call Joyce, Tara, Wash and Anya senseless deaths, which is really what most of us get. Wash's death scene was cathartic after I lost my father to a sudden heart attack.
redeem147 | September 28, 05:21 CET
DaddyCatALSO | September 28, 13:26 CET
Simon | September 28, 13:30 CET
Bunnies | September 28, 17:31 CET
barboo | September 28, 00:42 CET
Minor point: she was her little pumpkin BELLY. Much cuter nickname, IMHO. :)
guidedby | September 28, 19:10 CET
sumogrip | September 28, 20:36 CET
guidedby | September 29, 05:16 CET
:D
menomegirl | September 29, 16:45 CET
*doffs cap*
guidedby | September 30, 06:11 CET
That would be an interesting legal defense: "But it was an accident your honor, I was trying to murder someone else and got her by mistake...."
mbeauparland | October 01, 10:34 CET
Point of fact 2: Tara's death was also an accident. It's not like he was aiming for her.
I think both would belong in a "Innocent Bystander" type of category.
skynet_00101 | October 01, 16:40 CET