"I saw their production of Giselle in 1890. I cried like a baby. And I was evil!"
September 27
2012
Nine fun facts from Joss Whedon's Avengers commentary.
For starters, we find out which epic scene nearly didn't make the cut.
Simon
| The Avengers
| 14:01 CET
|
19 comments total
| tags: the avengers
This thread has been closed for new comments.
You need to
log in to be able to post comments.
About
membership.
« Older
Deconstructing Joss Whedon's most ...
|
A Dr. Horrible reunion at Haunted ...
Newer »
© 2002 - 2017 - WHEDONesque.com
(
e-mail)
Individual posts are copyright their respective authors
This is a non-profit, unofficial website, not affiliated with Mutant Enemy, Inc., 20th Century Fox, Warner Brothers or UPN.
Interesting. I've seen quite a few disgruntled comments about this, but it's not something that bothered me at all during the film. Why shouldn't that be the way these particular aliens happen to work? It's not as if we can point to real world Chitauri and say "see, when you kill their mothership, they actually keep on fighting!"
Yoink | September 27, 14:18 CET
There's no particular rules to how the Chitauri work!!!
Also, I can not WAIT to watch this with the commentary! :D
FangedFourLover | September 27, 14:27 CET
sumogrip | September 27, 14:29 CET
Simon | September 27, 14:31 CET
sumogrip | September 27, 14:33 CET
I'm not sure about "most" but obviously some did. I don't really see why, though. It's not as if there was any question that the Avengers would win once the portal was closed: clearly they could beat a finite number of Chitauri; they were only under threat if more and more and more kept pouring through the portal. So Iron Man's trick with the nuke is more about saving the earth from the nuke and delivering a bit of sweet revenge than it is about defeating the Chitauri, per se. The fact that it actually wipes out the Chitauri who have crossed the portal seems more in the way of a nice extra, not a crucial plot point without which the Avengers would never have triumphed.
I mean, it would have been perfectly easy to have the nuke go off and then run a little 2-minute montage of the Avengers doing alien mop-up on the remaining Chitauri: and that wouldn't meaningfully alter anything about the film's plot, would it? It would just read a little anticlimactically--hence the decision to cut straight to VICTORY!
[ edited by Yoink on 2012-09-27 23:42 ]
Yoink | September 27, 14:41 CET
(Note: for this paragraph I'm going to take the position of someone adamantly against the Chitauri-hive-thing; I am fairly indifferent in reality)
I don't think the answer to the issue is to show the Avengers handily taking care of the remainder. I think the answer is slipping in a moment earlier when we find out that this is how they work--for example, maybe the Queen Bee gets momentarily hurt and we see all the Chitauri on Earth flinch, or something stupid like that. Then the audience gets it: ohhh, there's a connection here.
The problem with the lack of set-up is that regardless of if it actually is or not, it feels like something done for the convenience of the running time, not because it's how the story would organically unfold.
When we're watching movies, I've always felt that there's a degree to which we sort of start watching them as if they're being made up as they go along (even though that's obviously not the case). So when there's a reveal that hasn't been established, it feels as though the screenwriter just made something up on the spot, even though pretty much every movie ever made has been through many, many drafts and revisions and it's obviously not the case that he just kinda made something up and threw it in there. And as I said to Simon, I think Joss probably made the right choice between having to do a cumbersome set-up vs. risking the appearance of a narrative cheat, but it doesn't change the mildly negative impact of the latter.
...also, I loved Avengers. Sorry, I just have to say it because I feel really bad having spent that much time trying to take apart a small moment in it. Truly, I adored it.
[ edited by Jobo on 2012-09-27 23:53 ]
sumogrip | September 27, 14:52 CET
I'm not sure that would make much of a difference, though, would it? I mean, isn't the objection that the Avengers didn't know that there was a connection of that kind, and that therefore Iron Man's attack is too much of a stroke of luck? I mean, even if the audience gets to see in advance that the connection is there, I don't see how it mitigates this being a lucky blow.
My argument is that the fact of it being a lucky blow doesn't matter. It would matter if the nuke was, in fact, the decisive element in the battle (our heroes shouldn't win because of mere luck, unless you're telling a rather different kind of story). But because it's just a bit of bonus alien killage, I don't see the problem.
Think of it this way. If you came to the climax of a western and you have a big duel-scene between the hero and the villain. The two men draw and fire simultaneously and both miss their targets. But the good guy's bullet carries on past the bad guy, hits what looks like a harmless barrel outside a store: the barrel turns out to be full of gunpowder; it explodes and a piece of wood from the barrel slams into the bad guy's head and kills him. Now, that would be a sucky ending (unless it was a comedy western). You'd think "hey, that's just a piece of crappy luck! There's no way the hero knew that hitting that barrel could do that!"
But play the scene again. Have your hero outdraw the bad guy and shoot him plumb between the eyes. Yay! Goodness triumphs! Victory is ours! And as the bad guy falls to the ground, he clutches convulsively at his gun and fires off a round that--oh irony--kills one of his evil henchmen. That seems to me analogous to the situation in The Avengers. It's not as if the killing or not killing of the evil henchman is crucial to the plot. We knew that once our hero won the duel the contest was over and that the evil henchman would be dealt with one way or the other. It's just a bonus piece of "take that, ya bastards!" for the audience to enjoy.
Truly, I adored it.
All right. We'll let you live. This time.
Yoink | September 27, 15:10 CET
gossi | September 27, 15:55 CET
digitlnoize | September 27, 16:14 CET
skittledog | September 28, 01:06 CET
Simon | September 28, 01:21 CET
chriskalina | September 28, 01:31 CET
BrewBunny | September 28, 02:17 CET
prettymaryk | September 28, 04:24 CET
So many plot holes. No wonder the film only made $1.5 billion....
zz9 | September 28, 05:05 CET
Sunfire | September 28, 06:00 CET
Not having heard the commentary, I loved reading this article. Wonderful titbits, and I love Joss's choices of favourite scene and shot. Myself, I would fervently desire to be Black Widow if she didn't have that red in her ledger. Sadly, I look more like the Hulk's gone to seed sibling.
[ edited by Maclay on 2012-09-28 16:39 ]
Maclay | September 28, 07:38 CET
How about Black Widow saying "It's about to get very hard to breathe" before the helicarrier lifts off, presumably referring to altitude, and then everyone being able to breathe quite happily after the hull is breached, in a big way, during the battle? And Fury being able to walk out the door with a rocket launcher.
So many plot holes. No wonder the film only made $1.5 billion....
Well...I was thinking when I watched the movie was, in all the "Oh shit! We're badly damaged and having problems with keeping the Helicarrier under control!" frou-feraw, they actually brought the ship to a lower altitude so they might be able to crash land easier if need be. Or to effect repairs. Or allow SHIELD troops to fight on the deck outside if needed.
;P
BlueEyedBrigadier | September 28, 08:19 CET