March 12 2004
Wonderful 'Wonderfalls' deserves shot.
"So how can we kill Wonderfalls? What excuses are left to not watch another potentially great Fox show? Card game? Toenail trimming? Back waxing? Why should Wonderfalls, which premieres tonight, work where others have failed?". The discussion thread for tonight's episode, chat about it at Flickr.
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.


So let your fellow posters know if you thought the hype was worth it or think it's a case the show suffers from the post Buffy Emperor's New Clothes syndrome.
Simon | March 12, 23:56 CET
NOLA64 | March 13, 04:01 CET
tacitron | March 13, 04:09 CET
I had many "laugh out loud" moments. I watched it with my husband and kids and they also thought it was funny. Both kids were cracking up constantly.
Firefly Flanatic | March 13, 04:24 CET
pesoto74 | March 13, 04:30 CET
I really hate network TV at times.
RavenU | March 13, 04:37 CET
Big gripe was the little "photo" cuts to change scenes. Seemed rather cheesy to me. But great writing, fun acting, etc. Here's hoping the fact that it's in The Time Slot Of Doom doesn't hold any bad omens.
syrcharles | March 13, 04:39 CET
weatherby | March 13, 04:42 CET
Firefly Flanatic | March 13, 04:44 CET
I'm not going to give up on it. I'm assuming it either A)Gets better, or B)Is an acquired taste, like "Sex and the City," which is a great show, but it takes a few episodes to adjust to it's provacative quirkiness. Besides, I only have six hours of TV left for me if I don't give it more chances.
Things I liked:
William Sadler
The bartender
The best friend
Next week's promo. That episode actually looks good. That's the one from Tim and Marita, right?
They cast normal-looking people, not insanely gorgeous-looking people. (exception-the bartender)
Things I didn't like:
Uber-uberquirky, like it's trying too hard to stand out
The acting was mostly pretty bad. I'm gonna be nice and say that the actors are probably adjusting to their roles.
It wasn't funny. Not really. It tried to be, but it just wasn't. Okay, except for the neck-stabbing scene. I was intensely smiling during that part.
It wasn't dramatic. You could care less about what happens to any of the characters, except the bartender, cuz he's nice.
It seems pretty gimmicky. But it's too soon to judge on that.
It didn't do a good job introducing all the characters. And people thought "The Train Job" was horrible at that! The only name I know is Jaye, and the only characters I feel familiar with other than her are the bartender, the best friend, the sister, and PoorBitch. And, I guess, the wax lion.
So, I will continue watching, because I am fairly confident that it will get better.
My Score: 3 out of 10
Invisible Green | March 13, 05:04 CET
Tim was right -- Caroline Dhavernas is wonderful. Her face is like a best-selling book of expressions. Just flip to any page and she sucks you right in.
Good show, TM! I hope Fox leaves it alone and lets it grow.
Wiseblood | March 13, 05:04 CET
AngelicSlayer | March 13, 05:44 CET
RootBoy42 | March 13, 05:56 CET
"You're not supposed to talk to strangers. Piss off!"
I definitely liked it. The camera work and editing, and especially that opening narrative with the story... VERY Dead Like Me. And while it reminded me so much of that show, which I also love, it was still able to be its own show. Introductions are always awkward and sometimes hard to follow, and I do feel this episode was a lot of that. But I also feel it's set up some great potential and I am very eager to see where they take things. It's shows like this that I typically enjoy the most.
I worry though. This show was quirky. How often do quirky shows succeed... on any network? That, and the Time Slot of Doom doesn't provide much hope. But I'm keeping my fingers crossed and if nothing else, we'll still have the DVDs when they come out.
Greyflowers | March 13, 06:12 CET
No opening credits sequence. Sure, pilots of quite a few good shows (including Roswell and Miracles) have lacked main titles, but I really see it as a sign of disorganization.
The score music was possibly the worst possible. Ow, my ears!
Invisible Green | March 13, 07:01 CET
electricspacegirl | March 13, 07:05 CET
I was disappointed in the lack of credits, too, but since there is a theme song (and it's great), I assume they'll show up eventually.
katayla | March 13, 07:25 CET
Please get good ratings, please get good ratings, please get good ratings...
MindPieces | March 13, 09:20 CET
ringworm | March 13, 09:41 CET
But I'm not sure how well I liked the show overall, I'll have to give it time. I definitely liked it well enough to want to give it time though.
forcorreo | March 13, 09:49 CET
I loved the blind date/hospital sequence. There was much laughter here.
What I didn't like was the local Fox affiliates eagerness to send another promising series to the gallows. Instead of the prime time spot on the night of death that most of the rest of the country got, our Fox superstars thought an 11:40pm Friday slot would be great. We absolutely need that basketball, after all. I'm beginning to take this personally. Angel is constantly pre-empted for the same reason.
Haborym | March 13, 10:32 CET
Robo-Ritter | March 13, 10:44 CET
Christopher | March 13, 10:57 CET
Simon | March 13, 11:02 CET
Christopher | March 13, 11:13 CET
RavenU | March 13, 11:14 CET
Erm, I wasn't misunderstood was I? I liked the show.
forcorreo | March 13, 12:55 CET
Caroline | March 13, 13:04 CET
Not bad coming from someone who only watches "Survivor".
wissxwe | March 13, 15:34 CET
I think pilots often drop the opening credits because if they were to keep with the "Teaser-->Credits-->Commercials-->Act I" format, it gives viewers enough time to change the channel. By skipping straight to Act I, the audience is thrown into the story right away. Also, I think a three-minute opening teaser is probably tough to write when nobody knows any of the characters in the first place. Not impossible, of course, but harder.
Oh, and I loved it, even the Viewmaster scene transitions. And this:
-Am I crazy?
-Crazy-insane, or crazy I put a camera in my house and pretended I was on Big Brother?
VampiresSuckLOLOLGetIt | March 13, 16:33 CET
Linda | March 13, 16:42 CET
But everything else I did love -- the hilarious dialogue, the mixture of cynicism and sweetness, and most of all, Jaye. She felt "real" to me. Loved her. Adored her. This is a unique, truly original show. Head and shoulders above most of the other stuff on tv. I wasn't sure how they'd be able to pull off the little talking figures but they did it, and did it well.
One thing, though: am I the only hot-blooded female to not find the bartender particularly compelling? I didn't hate him, but didn't adore him, either. I hope that the series doesn't revolve too much around his character.
phlebotinin | March 13, 16:50 CET
But really it smells way too much like a 'who-are-we-gonna-help-this-week' format, which is kind of a pet peeve of mine in TV shows. It's why I never got into Quantm Leap or Tru Calling or most of the other shows like that.
EdDantes | March 13, 19:50 CET
I didn't misunderstand you at all. :) I'd just heard those words being used to describe the characterall over the place, positively and negatively. I didn't mean to sound as if I were directing my opinion at your post.
When's the first Minear episode again?
Haborym | March 13, 20:10 CET
forcorreo | March 13, 22:05 CET
Caroline | March 13, 22:31 CET
Tracy | March 13, 23:04 CET
I'll pimp this show with my dying breath. I truly believe in it.
Allyson | March 14, 01:15 CET
Might need those bookends. Thanks Caroline!
melsta | March 14, 03:39 CET
It may not be the Whedonverse, but it's clever, original and I doubt that anyone is going to be voted off or forced to eat bugs. I'm not utterly dependent on Joss, I can enjoy episodic TV without him. I keep telling myself that while I channel surf and inevitably settle on techTV or a DVD.
And I could be wrong on the bug eating thing...
Haborym | March 14, 05:25 CET