Whedonesque : Comments on 3409 : SFGate columnist's diatribe to Gail Berman about Wonderfalls.

This site will work and look better in a browser that supports web standards, but it is accessible to any browser or Internet device.

March 27 2004

SFGate columnist's diatribe to Gail Berman about Wonderfalls. Gail Berman, Milkwoman of Human Kindness, I'm speaking directly to you here -- how about believing in the brilliance once in a while ...

Also Wonderfalls related:

Marsters hometown paper begging viewers to watch Wonderfalls.Now, you might ask, what does this have to do with the Modesto entertainment scene? Honestly, very little (unless, of course, you own a television and like to watch good programming).

Times Union critic to TV viewers ... Only you can save "Wonderfalls" Memo to Fox programmers: Air "Wonderfalls" after one of your many "American Idol" helpings and see if people stick around.

RavenU | Wonderfalls | 09:03 CET | 6 comments total | tags:

Marijke Rowland has wrote a couple of articles in the past referencing her love for the whedonverse. I'd post links but they require registering/payment. poot.

jenguin | March 27, 11:40 CET

So far it's not asking for registration when I go to the site but it may after a day.

RavenU | March 27, 11:46 CET

RavenU I've combined 3 of your Wonderfalls posts into one. As I've said before I don't want Whedonesque getting swamped with Wonderfalls reviews etc.

Simon | March 27, 13:38 CET

Word Simon, I am not yet on the Wonderfalls bandwA GON...JOSS, we need another Buffyverse replacement stat.

Simpleba | March 28, 13:17 CET

Ok Simon, sorry, I didn't know if these fell under a review catagory or not, since they were not reviewing an episode as much as asking or begging people to watch. If it's ok I might change this post from the Marsters hometown paper to the SFGate article instead only because it pleads to Gail Berman, who like Tim M was and is a producer of Angel and actually without her we would have no Whedonesque verse of which to speak at all or if we did it would more than likely be a Buffy and Angel less one, except for the movie.

RavenU | March 28, 16:42 CET

Yes thats fine, it does make sense :).

Simon | March 29, 00:24 CET

You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.

« Older 'Wonderfalls' on April 1 -- No Foo... | 'Wonderfalls' widens puzzle of the... Newer »