Six reasons
why Buffy characters shouldn't go to Angel. An editorial at Zentertainment from their Angel reviewer.
She's got a lot of good points here. And yes, we all hope for the characters not to fall into limbo after the imminent demise of BtVS, but sometimes it is best just to let sleeping dogs lie.
November 08 2002
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.


Nyx | November 09, 04:32 CET
I haven't been with Angel from the beginning, but I must concur with the editorial. IF Whedon keeps things going in Sunnydale, it should be a separate show, and kept on the UPN. Make Willow, Xander, Dawn & Spike the central characters. Name it something different. Drop "Buffy" and "Vampire" and just call it "The Slayers." If you build it they will come.
Don't kill Buffy. She's already been dead twice. That'd just be repetitive. Say she and Giles take off together to parts unknown, and they leave Sunnydale. Maybe Buffy comes back for special guest engagements but it'd be better if they just let SMG go off and do her thing. Then a year later, on BBC America, have Giles come back, in a show made just for him. No Buffy. If asked, Giles just blows off the question, saying they had "a difference of opinion." He's very bitter about it.
No other old characters. Giles gets a new cast of characters who help him solve crimes and debunk ghost sightings. Call it RIPPER.
ZachsMind | November 09, 06:13 CET
So even if they move Willie, Jonathon and the lunch lady from "Earshot" over to Angel after S7 ends, I'll trust in Joss that he knows what the heck he's doing.
Saturn Girl | November 11, 00:11 CET