An Analysis of Cheese as Metaphor in Buffy the Vampire Slayer
"So I have made it my mission to discover and reveal the secrets of the cheese guy. And I think I may have cracked it."
Lots of links to various episodes. A good read.
July 05 2004
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.


Simon | July 05, 16:09 CET
or something...
redtenko | July 05, 16:40 CET
Coll | July 05, 17:03 CET
Love it!
Flair | July 05, 17:07 CET
RavenU | July 05, 17:14 CET
Flair | July 05, 18:04 CET
vastgirlie | July 05, 18:05 CET
[ edited by Coll on 2004-07-05 16:12 ]
Coll | July 05, 18:10 CET
Simon | July 05, 18:11 CET
vastgirlie | July 05, 18:25 CET
vamRIPire | July 05, 19:04 CET
I was so happy to get closure on that.
Willowy | July 05, 19:18 CET
buffyfanatic18 | July 05, 19:50 CET
On topic, sort of: The other day I was cooking and, to my wife's amusement and bemusement, sang, to the tune of "A World Without Love", "I don't care what they say, I won't stay, in a world without cheese."
So put me squarely in Coll's column!
Chris inVirginia | July 05, 20:07 CET
Dave! | July 05, 20:35 CET
Illyria | July 05, 20:52 CET
And I like the Halfrek/Spike bit because it shows that William would have make Cecily a better husband than whoever else she chose, a man she didn't think was "beneath her."
Gaudior | July 05, 20:54 CET
Illyria | July 05, 21:05 CET
stiansaint | July 05, 21:14 CET
It's clear that Cecily became Halfrek...
Actually, Halfrek is talking with Anya in one episode about being witness to the Crimean War (1854-1856). The first time we see Spike and Cecily, it's 1880. Now I know we were never given an estimate for how old William was supposed to be when he was vamped, but you see how the ages don't match up, right? Cecily couldn't have been adult and witness to the Crimean War if she was human during that period (I doubt she was even alive, though she could've been a baby during the 1854-1856 period). I think what was intended is this (and I'm not the first person to come up with this obviously, it's been speculated to death)--Halfrek was posing as a human and using the name Cecily when she met William. She had integrated herself into his society for a time, and most likely left it some time after he was vamped.
Kris | July 05, 22:18 CET
Gaudior | July 05, 22:19 CET
redfern | July 05, 23:22 CET
Meaning, I was rash in saying that "it's clear the Cecily became Halfrek." Given the chronology, it seems more likely that Halfrek became *Cecily*, for a while, at least. She still would have known Spike as William, and he easily could have recognized Cecily in Hallie.
Chris inVirginia | July 05, 23:31 CET
Hey it's absolutely possible he's right on everything, but it's also quite possible Joss would scratch his head and wonder what this guy is on about if he read this.
On Cecily/Halfrek, when my wife and I saw that ep we knew it was the same actress, and we were wondering if they would 'do' anything with it. When she and Spike recognized each other and she even called him 'William' there was no doubt in our minds she was Cecily. It is cool to have a writer confirm that that was indeed the idea though. Always regretted they didn't follow up on it. I know there was no space but it could've been a cool sub-plot.
And yeah, it's been established Vengeance Demons can assume human identities complete with 'background'. Anya was an officially listed student of Sunnydale High. No problem seeing how Hally could be a victorion aristocrat if she chose so for a while.
One thing though, just because she was a Vengeance Demon doesn't mean she became one because of a man betraying her. Scorned women was Anya's thing. Halfrek's forte was children wronged by parents or 'daddy issues' as Anya put it....;-)
EdDantes | July 05, 23:50 CET
400lb_Gorilla | July 06, 00:11 CET
I also would've loved to have had more opportunity to find out about Cecily/Halfrek too. That was a golden opportunity that they didn't follow through on.
They could've done a flashback where Halfrek is trying to do her demon duties and William keeps following her around like a puppydog getting in her way trying to read her poetry and that is what leads up to her insulting him. He could've kept popping up just as she's about to get her target to say "I wish.." and there's William, with yet another poem he wants to share. She didn't mean anything by it, just wanted to get rid of him, and because of what she did it led him to Druscila and the rest is history.
Firefly Flanatic | July 06, 00:37 CET
[ edited by Caleb on 2004-07-06 00:07 ]
Caleb | July 06, 00:44 CET
Hee!
Gaudior | July 06, 00:44 CET
lycoming | July 06, 00:45 CET
KernelM | July 06, 01:04 CET
Willowy | July 06, 01:07 CET
"I think that the cheese man did have a meaning or rather, the cheese did. I believe it was a reference to the children's song "The Farmer in the Dell" and the line "The cheese stands alone." The cheese is Buffy. For Xander, it was meant to tell him that Buffy will not always be able to protect him and that he has to protect himself. To Giles it was meant to convey that the Watcher controls the slayer, she does not control him - and his frustration that unfortunately that has not always been the case. For Willow, I think it's meant to convey that she sees herself as being "very small" and able to fit into the small spaces in Buffy's life, as well as in the world. Having said all that, I also think that perhaps Joss put the cheese motif in there for two reasons, one being what I just wrote, and the other being for comic relief for those who did get the meanings and for those who did not. That way the cheese man served a purpose for all.
[Editors note: Actually Joss himself said that the cheese man was meaningless comic relief but this analysis is too good to leave out]"
barbara | July 06, 01:23 CET
edit: aha! nice work, barbara.
[ edited by orphea on 2004-07-06 00:26 ]
orphea | July 06, 02:25 CET
A little harder to apply to Joss because he is still around for us to talk to and his work has yet to really age. But I sincerely hope that there is more to the art of Buffy than just what Joss says or else soon enough the scholarly 'verse will die, rather than grow richer with time.
Maybe it's just because I'm totally buy this cheese arguement....
randygiles | July 06, 06:00 CET
spikeangellover | July 06, 07:05 CET
See...Thats the thing. He DIDN'T recognize her. He sees her in demon face in Older and Far Away, and never actually registers who she is. He just says "hey..wait a minute" or something like that. I interpreted as him being confused on how she knew his human name. But..in Entropy, Spike sees Halfreck in her human face. I have no doubt in my mind that Spike would've recognized Cecily if it was supposed to be the same character, if they ever intended on this being a actual fact I believe they would've taken the chance to make that a fact in Entropy. And they didn't. So its not canon, I honestly don't care what the actress or DG said if what I see on screen contradicts it.
eddy | July 06, 08:36 CET
stiansaint | July 06, 15:43 CET
I loved this article! I know Joss said the Cheeseman meant nothing; however when he appears during the dreams sequences he does say very pointed things ("I've made a little space for the cheese slices", "These will not protect you", "I wear the cheese. It does not wear me") . Great article! The cheeseman was always too deliberate in what he said and how he was placed to be accidental, and meaningless, and just comic relief.
Cecily in Hallie
I knew it was the same actress - at some point I heard that they cast the same actress by accident and hadn't realized that the same woman had previously appeared as Cecily when they cast her as Halfreck. It is cool how the writers then had some fun with it. I never worked out the dates so it is neat to think Cecily was really Halfreck looking for business.
Passion | July 06, 17:39 CET
Coll | July 06, 18:29 CET
I read it the same way – and enjoyed the article much more because of that. From the very beginning, where she states that Joss was either lying or in denial – which i found very funny and not at all intended to be serious – she sets up her argument with the full realization that this may be all a zealous fan's over-interpretation of something that was in fact originally meaningless, in the same vein of so much that's written in academia. All that said, i really enjoyed her interpretation, which is pretty solid and creative – and the numerous references to cheese in the buffyverse that she compiles! - and I liked it all the more because she didn't take herself too seriously.
acp | July 06, 19:59 CET
vastgirlie | July 06, 22:19 CET
"The poets have been mysteriously silent on the subject of cheese." ~ G.K. Chesterton
(But not the writers of BtVS, for which we can all be grateful.)
"A cheese may disappoint. It may be dull, it may be naive, it may be oversophisticated. Yet it remains cheese, milk's leap toward immortality."
~ Clifton Fadiman, American writer and editor; New Yorker book reviewer
(Much like cheese, Buffy may have suffered variations in quality over the years, but she never lost her essence, right up until she passed into the hallowed annals of greatness. Some would even argue that Buffy's latter-season funkiness -- her sometimes 'stinky' cheese-mold crust, if you will -- was an inseperable part of what made her who she was, and that it was a natural outgrowth of her character. Fuzzy gray spots and all. ;)
Wiseblood | July 08, 01:05 CET