Fan site disowns Tru Calling.
Eliza's latest series not proving to be all that popular, even with its own fans!
Can't say i'm too surprised about this. I've REALLY tried to like this show but it adds a whole new meaning to bland writing. Not to mention that the fact it exists stops a Faith show from ever happening.
July 15 2004
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.


Kris | July 15, 14:43 CET
Simon | July 15, 14:47 CET
electricspacegirl | July 15, 14:54 CET
willowzbitch | July 15, 15:01 CET
SeanValen | July 15, 15:06 CET
Personally, I like the show, but perhaps I'm the only one. :/
Amberina | July 15, 15:43 CET
Sorry I haven't posted for a while. I have been in and out of the home office.
Tracy | July 15, 16:19 CET
I honestly can't see Tru Calling getting sufficiently better to draw in many new fans. Quite honestly none of the characters have grabbed me at all and the basic premise is far too repetitive for my taste.
Both Buffy and Angel grabbed my attention in their very first episodes and the characters immediately interested me. After half an entire season i still didn't care enough about Tru and her family and friends to stick around.
Quite truthfully if it was just a case of me not liking a show i wouldn't care but this particular show features an actress that i know deserves better. Now there is also another writer (Jane Espenson) attached to the project that is being totally wasted.
Here's hoping that the first few episodes of season two do badly and the show is cancelled early on in the season. That way both Eliza and Jane are freed up for better things.
*cough*Faith*cough* ;)
Disciple of Spike | July 15, 17:04 CET
vastgirlie | July 15, 18:52 CET
Well it's true some shows should be given the chance to grow and find their footing. I mean I always felt that BtVS really got into it's groove in the second season. But the first season should still be sufficiently good to warrant that second season at the very least.
And Tru Calling is just so bland. Plot holes and logic errors abound but even that could be forgiven if it was funny, or original and exciting or emotionally gripping. But it's just so bland and mediocre. And kind of repetitive.
And I have the impression that they don't really know where to take the concept. The Jack thing had potential, but now he's just the bad guy that Tru should beat in 'fast running through town'. How come no one ever wonders where this came from? And if we don't want to go the Joan of Arcadia way (I know I don't) then shouldn't the fact that nature produced her 'counterpart' in Jack not make her doubt everything? (Nice how they swiped that idea from 'Unbreakable' by the way) That maybe he could be right? Maybe someone she saves should have died. Maybe that person will kill a family of 5 in a car accident that wouldn't have happened had she left well enough alone. Tru and her friends should at LEAST be asking themselves those questions.
These are interesting possibilities they could go with but they haven't and I doubt they will. And THIS show gets chance after chance from Fox....it's odd. I guess it's the right kind of simplistic black&white 'wholesomeness' they're looking for these days that Firefly and Wonderfalls didn't have.
EdDantes | July 15, 22:46 CET
I watched 2 episodes of Tru Calling but they failed to catch my attention. I've not seen the rest. Everyone is different and this show just didn't interest me enough. I'll try to watch it again next season and hope that I'd find something worthwhile for me.
Silent Night | July 15, 22:58 CET
This is exactly what I've been saying. I thought that's where they were going to take the show when Jack started bringing up these questions but they dropped the ball. They painted it all black and white with Jack getting into her father's car, someone we already knew was a bad guy, and them donning the black hats while Tru piously insists she is doing the right thing.
electricspacegirl | July 16, 00:31 CET
And the points above are spot on. It's lacking in humor, the trite "waiter drops a tray to signal we've seen a scene before" with the extremley laboured flashbacks to remind us why something is imporant since we're all as dumb as toast and could never remember that we saw something ten minutes ago by ourselves...
And with BtVS and Ats we had good people doing bad things for good reasons and vice versa. We have opposing opionions where both have valid points. There was always a sense that the story had layers, actions had consequences, characters had to live with their deeds.
All I ever saw in TC was "Someone's dead, obvious suspect wait it wasn't him after all whew saved them happy ever after NEXT"
I would love a Faith series, but I don't want Eliza to have her show cancelled. I just wish I kenw what she saw in the show in the first place.
zz9 | July 16, 02:00 CET
Invisible Green | July 16, 02:56 CET
Yep. Without ever even wondering about it. That was so dissappointing I felt most of the slack I had been willing to cut this young show just sorta evaporate.
"I think Eliza chose the role because she wanted to play a new character and she was flattered that the creators of "Tru Calling" wrote the pilot script with her in mind for the role. "
Yeah and that's understandable. Plus it was a bigger network, and wouldn't be seen as a second-rate Buffy. 'Cept of course to most people now it became the second-rate 'Joan of Arcadia', but...
EdDantes | July 16, 08:30 CET