October 15 2004
Kristine Sutherland is shilling for Advil
in a new U.S. TV commercial.
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.
This site will work and look better in a browser that supports web standards, but it is accessible to any browser or Internet device.

Angela | October 15, 08:24 CET
RavenU | October 15, 08:34 CET
redtenko | October 15, 08:35 CET
Firefly Flanatic | October 15, 08:37 CET
Caroline | October 15, 08:55 CET
Arista | October 15, 15:48 CET
Gypsy | October 15, 17:04 CET
I only saw that commercial once and it was such a fast shot that I thought it was my imagination, I figured it was someone who looked like Kristine but that it wouldn't be her.
Passion | October 15, 17:32 CET
I'm glad she's getting work in commercials. It's hard for even the best actors to get work on a regular basis in TV or films. It's even harder if you are female and even remotely look over 25. Hollywood is brutal to older women. I hope her Advil ad runs forever. That way she gets lots of residual checks that will pay for her food, rent and other basics and allow her to still act in theatre or do whatever creative thing she wants to do.
Is a TV ad a waste of her talent? Yes. BUT UNLESS YOU ARE WILLING TO CUT HER A BIG FAT CHECK TO HELP PAY HER BILLS, QUIT YOUR B*TCH*N'. Let the woman earn a living. At least she not hawking diet pills in half-hour infomercials.
ranchofiasco | October 15, 18:13 CET
This isn't just a commercial. It's a national commercial. That's bigger than you might think. So go buy a bottle of Advil and support Buffy's mom. It ain't gonna kill you.
[ edited by ZachsMind on 2004-10-15 17:03 ]
ZachsMind | October 15, 18:27 CET
There's nothing shameful about commercials. Even Catherine Zeta-Jones does T-Mobile.
Invisible Green | October 15, 18:34 CET
Simon | October 15, 18:43 CET
A bit odd in that she's doing a commercial for a headache remedy (at least that's all I ever take Advil for) given the way she died in "The Body."
Chris in Virginia | October 15, 18:52 CET
Added later: I didn't mean to insinuate above that Advil should have used her name, but her on camera presence would serve the country good in the future if she did become their spokesperson, sorta like that guy in the trenchcoat for Sprint PCS. Sutherland doesn't have to use her name but she conveys to an audience how Advil wants people to see their firm. I understand that her name recognition isn't very high with the mainstream general public.
[ edited by ZachsMind on 2004-10-15 18:08 ]
ZachsMind | October 15, 19:12 CET
I'm not sure giving her name would have much effect. She's not really a 'name'. She's got a generic, but warm, mom look to her. I think that's what makes her good for commercials like this. I could also see her in one of those old "Mom, did you ever have that not-so-fresh feeling?" commercials. She's just one of those mom types that radiate a trustworthy vibe. I mean, for instance, you wouldn't want Steve Buscemi hawking your headache tabs, no matter how great he is.
[ edited by Rogue Slayer on 2004-10-15 17:37 ]
Rogue Slayer | October 15, 19:37 CET
Karen | October 16, 02:42 CET
By my comment that I would prefer to see KS in a tv show or movie, I certainly wasn't saying there is anything shameful in a commercial - a national one at that - as ZachsMind said.
BUT UNLESS YOU ARE WILLING TO CUT HER A BIG FAT CHECK TO HELP PAY HER BILLS, QUIT YOUR B*TCH*N'. - ranchofiasco.
No one's b*itch*n about it - just paying her a compliment by saying I'd like to see her more regularly, and for longer than 30 seconds. :)
Angela | October 16, 02:48 CET