(SPOILER)
An Average Joe's take on the above-average Serenity.
A Serenity review from somebody who hasn't already been camping out in front of the theater in his browncoat, spurs and very fine hat.
I only scanned the article, on account of avoiding the spoilers, but from what I read it seemed very positive.
December 17 2004
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.


Firefly Flanatic | December 17, 09:33 CET
In case you can't tell he loved it!
[ edited by catalyst2 on 2004-12-17 07:38 ]
[ edited by catalyst2 on 2004-12-17 07:38 ]
catalyst2 | December 17, 09:37 CET
He said the movie might in fact be as good or better than Star Wars, that he loved the characters, the story, the villains. He thought it was fantastic basicly :).
Only complaint was that Mal was a bit too much like Han Solo.
rabid | December 17, 09:39 CET
Firefly Flanatic | December 17, 09:39 CET
Firefly Flanatic | December 17, 09:41 CET
He loved River, loved the villain and the villain's backstory, the character driven plot etc. Compared it to Star wars this way - and this sums up the tone of the whole article really (sorry for the long quote):
I can’t and won’t say that Serenity was better than Star Wars, because they are way too different for me to compare them. But let me put it this way: All my life I’ve envied most adults for having had the experience of watching Star Wars in the theater before it was big. To have had that moment of “Oh my god, this is f**king amazing. Oh my god, this is gonna be huge!” Well, frankly I was jealous - until now. I now feel like I’ve had that kind of experience, and I’ll be able to tell my children that I was at the first public screening (after which they will shoot me confused expressions and whisper “daddy’s a geek” to each other).
catalyst2 | December 17, 09:53 CET
I hope Joss reads this person's perspectative take on the film and takes his suggestion to the marketing woman to heart and to her. As far as I'm concerned Joss has never made anything that wasn't character driven, with effects being the nice aside to it. If it was effects driven it wouldn't be Joss, cause if anything he has always been about the interaction of the dialouge of the characters not how well they looked in a fight.
RavenU | December 17, 09:58 CET
But, again, wow! I'm thrilled that the guy was so blown away with it! If a non fan feels that way, are some of us going to be passing out with joy when we finally get to see it?!!
Firefly Flanatic | December 17, 09:58 CET
catalyst2 | December 17, 10:00 CET
Firefly Flanatic | December 17, 10:02 CET
Edited to add: It just registered in my head that he said he'd already posted his review on another site!! I hope it was a Star Wars fan site (and he may have said that but I need some sleep). The brush fire is already starting and not a rain cloud in sight!!!
[ edited by blwessels on 2004-12-17 08:36 ]
Firefly Flanatic | December 17, 10:33 CET
I was ok with waiting a long time when it was announced for April, but now with the delay followed by such enthusiastic test-screenings...
Gotta find something to occupy myself, I think I might rewatch Angel season 4 (not my favorite year, but I have this great desire to rewatch it)
Ugh I feel odd, almost like I'm trying to fill up the spare time of my life so that the wait for a movie seems shorter... I don't think that's healthy lol.
rabid | December 17, 10:55 CET
I'm sitting here smiling, when suddenly I realise, it's about 9 months away :(.
Totally with you on that one rabid.
EDIT: I also cracked and have now read the article and it's even better than I thought. Excellent.
[ edited by Paul_Rocks on 2004-12-17 09:54 ]
Paul_Rocks | December 17, 11:47 CET
On the other hand, it just occured to me, but Joss has got mad props for taking a failed movie and turning it into a relatively successful but massively influential TV show. How much would he rock if he took a short-lived TV series and made it into a freakishly beloved science fiction movie phenomenon? He would seriously rock.
dottikin | December 17, 12:06 CET
Madhatter | December 17, 13:33 CET
Apocalypse | December 17, 13:38 CET
I'm so excited about this movie I can't stand it. I can't wait for the previews to start. Anyone know when they will start? Has there been a post? I'll check the archives but if not let me know.
Spikecam21 | December 17, 14:40 CET
Zoic_Fan | December 17, 14:53 CET
They were original meant to start before Electra, so next month, but that was before the Serenity release date was put back so I'm assuming we'll have to wait a bit longer now....
EDIT to make it clear I was answering Spikecam21
[ edited by Paul_Rocks on 2004-12-17 12:54 ]
Paul_Rocks | December 17, 14:53 CET
Spikecam21 | December 17, 15:00 CET
Quit | December 17, 15:34 CET
Paul_Rocks | December 17, 15:46 CET
If people like him go and see it again and again, great. But there aren't that many people like him. The review gives no indication of what the average movie-goer will think of the film. And that's really the most crucial element to Serenity's success.
Quit | December 17, 16:06 CET
What the review tells me is that a non-Firefly fan fell in love with the characters in two hours. The cool plot developments and space/action stuff were the icing on the cake. If the characters are great, people - average and non-average Joes and Janes alike - will love the movie. That's assuming it's marketed in the proper way.
phlebotinin | December 17, 17:56 CET
wren | December 17, 18:07 CET
Yeah, I figured that fact was enough to give him the "average" label.
I don't think the fact that he (Is it a "he"? If not, my apologies) seems big into the sci-fi detracts from his representation of the mainstream too much. Because I'd imagine that the main audience the film will want to target, at least initially, will be people who would actually pay to see a sci-fi movie. Just as you wouldn't spend too much time selling a romantic-comedy to horror fans...first, you target the audience that is most going to make the film seem like A Hit. And then advertise as such.
Or not. It's not like I really know.
VampiresSuckLOLOLGetIt | December 17, 20:13 CET
kdavid323 | December 17, 20:15 CET
Firefly Flanatic | December 17, 20:20 CET
This guy may not be a wallpaper hanger from Sheboygan or a chartered accountant from Pittsburgh, but he's a member of a core audience (sci-fi geek) who must "get" this movie if it's going to succeed at the box office. Browncoats and Whedon geeks alone won't do it. If the general sci-fi audience embraces Serenity, then it has a chance to generate industry buzz, and once that happens, the REAL Average Joes--the people who usually have little interest in science fiction--will be drawn in. And if THAT happens, fellow Whedonequers, Joss might have another phenomenon on his hands.
cjl | December 17, 20:31 CET
I agree that this reviewer is the perfect Average Joe for the core sci-fi audience that Universal probably wants to target. (Hence the applicability of VampiresSuckLOLGetIt's post headline.) That the reviewer's into Star Wars doesn't matter a whit to me. He's a sci-fi (and movie) fan who hadn't seen Firefly and loved Serenity anyway. This bodes extremely well for Serenity's box office, in my opinion.
I can't wait for this film to come out. I also can't wait for the DVD to come out so I can watch it anytime I wish and delve obsessively into its Whedony depths o' brilliance. That I will love Serenity is as certain as death and taxes.
phlebotinin | December 17, 20:48 CET
Can anyone identify the woman who said the movie was "effects-driven"? I find it hard to believe anyone with the vaguest smattering of knowledge of Joss's work would say such a thing.
SoddingNancyTribe | December 17, 21:02 CET
I will be going to see 'Serenity' when the film hits the UK. In fact, I have just today ordered the DVD of 'Firefly', inspired to do so by the enthusiasm of many WHEDONesque regulars, and encouraged by their advice to me to stop sitting on the fence and jump right in.
I have no idea how to gage the audience for a film such as this. If the reviews are good that will surely help. However, bad reviews don't necessarily mean a film will not be a box office hit. 'The Grudge' is proof of that. Mind you, it is a much better film than many of the reviews suggest, not that I am in any way biased!
(I am not suggesting, by the way, that 'Serenity' will get bad reviews.)
Oh, and SNT, congratulations!
alien lanes | December 17, 21:08 CET
I don't know what the desired demographics for a movie like this are, but the reviewer is still in highschool. With disposible income and text messaging. ;-) Sounds pretty ideal to me.
Lioness | December 18, 00:17 CET
alien lanes | December 18, 00:21 CET
Lioness | December 18, 01:22 CET
RavenU | December 18, 04:59 CET
Why is SNT blue?
pezwitch | December 18, 05:14 CET
I'm the guy that wrote the "firefly virgin" review that's been spread around. I wanted to respond to a couple of your comments...so here it is:
"He said the movie might in fact be as good or better than Star Wars"
If you read my review, I said that I cannot compare the two...but I certainly have an equal love for them.
"It just registered in my head that he said he'd already posted his review on another site!! I hope it was a Star Wars fan site"
I posted it on firefly fan sites, but didn't even think to post on star wars sites...GOOD IDEA. Unfortunetely, as much of a star wars fan as I am, I don't know of any good message boards on star wars. If you know of any, please feel free to link them to my review.
“He's a Star Wars fan, and remained one after those two horrible prequels. That doesn't fill me with confidence.”
Let me ask you something. If there was a really bad Firefly episode…would you hate the whole series? As bad as the prequals were…it still doesn’t change the fact that the original trilogy was amazing. So I believe I have every right to be a fan of star wars as a whole even though 2 of the 5 movies stunk.
“I suppose I should clarify. He is not your typical Star Wars fan. He calls himself "Frosty Skywalker", and is described as "as big a “Star Wars” booster as you’ll hope to find". He is not your Average Joe.”
The Aintitcool.com staff member “Hercules” posted my review (I’m magicdgk)…Hercules was talking about a friend of HIS named “Frosty Skywalker”, a completely separate person from I. I would also like to point out that as much as I LOVE star wars, I am not an all encompassing sci-fi fan. I do not like Star Trek, nor have I ever watched the sci-fi channel or Farscape. So for me to like Firefly was a big surprise to me.
“Can anyone identify the woman who said the movie was "effects-driven"? I find it hard to believe anyone with the vaguest smattering of knowledge of Joss's work would say such a thing.”
I don’t know her name, but she was the Nielsen rep who ran the focus group afterward.
magicdgk | December 18, 05:14 CET
Firefly Flanatic | December 18, 05:23 CET
I agree that the Star Wars prequels do not taint in any way the magic of the originals - I was one of those "original audience members" of which you spoke. My mum gave my brothers and me the day off school and took us to the Dominion Theatre on Tottenham Court Road to see Star Wars in 1977. I was enchanted and transported. I firmly believe that I will be again, in my slightly older incarnation today, upon seeing Serenity. Thanks again!
And for those who are asking: no, no bugs were ingested. At least, not during my recent "ascension" . . . I find Weetabix gives me all the fibre I need. Like Giles, however, I prefer it without blood.
SoddingNancyTribe | December 18, 05:45 CET
WAY ahead of you...the first thing I did when I got home after the Serenity screening was order the dvd set off Amazon.com So good advice ;)
magicdgk | December 18, 06:10 CET
Firefly Flanatic | December 18, 06:15 CET
eddy | December 18, 06:24 CET
Edited to add: Just changed my username from Blwessels to Firefly Flanatic because I've been planning on doing that and this looked like a good time to do it!!
[ edited by Firefly Flanatic on 2004-12-18 04:30 ]
Firefly Flanatic | December 18, 06:27 CET
Willowy | December 18, 06:36 CET
Firefly Flanatic | December 18, 06:38 CET
Willowy | December 18, 07:58 CET
Lioness | December 18, 08:16 CET
And everyone else who didn't know me as "blwessels" will wonder who the heck you're talking to. :)
[ edited by Firefly Flanatic on 2004-12-18 06:18 ]
Firefly Flanatic | December 18, 08:17 CET
Firefly Flanatic | December 18, 08:19 CET
And since I have managed to miss Firefly completly up till now that I'm watching my shiney DVD boxset I keep seeing the odd thing that makes me go "Oh, THAT'S what that's all about!" For example, I just saw "Captin Tightpants"
zz9 | December 18, 23:48 CET
eddy | December 19, 05:24 CET
newcj | December 19, 21:05 CET
eddy | December 19, 22:41 CET
lalaa | December 20, 00:32 CET