March 14 2005
X-Men 3 Director named - Not Whedon.
Matthew Vaughn, best of luck to him.
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.
This site will work and look better in a browser that supports web standards, but it is accessible to any browser or Internet device.

wren | March 14, 18:37 CET
And if any one wants to know how this all started, well personally I cite this Cinescape poll. All the rumours progressed from that. Amazing what an internet poll can do, isn't it?
Simon | March 14, 18:56 CET
Still, with the 'barbershop' guy on Fantastic Four, and now this guy with not just only one movie of note, but one movie *period* as a director's credit on his belt, I have to worry a teensy bit if this isn't also a little bit about saving money on a cheap director so more of the budget can go to actors of name and special effects.
Time will tell. I wish him good luck and hopefully he'll churn out a great X3. (I prefer my pessimistic side to be proven wrong, because that means a good movie I'll enjoy watching)
EdDantes | March 14, 20:08 CET
Honestly, why doesn’t the whole world revolve around getting more of His Jossness on the screen? It’s just not right.
Sorry, I’m having a really whiny moment.
EdDantes, don’t forget Paul Greengrass on the Bourne Supremacy. He did a great job with what was quite pedestrian material IMHO. New guys can bring a really fresh perspective, so lets hope for the best.
miranda | March 14, 20:29 CET
Personally i'm not much of a comic collector anymore so his Astonishing X-Men work is neither here or there to me. All i've been reading recently is what a friend of mine passes in my direction and AXM hasn't been among them. I will be getting the Angel comic books myself but he only has a supervisory role in them at best. As for Wonder Woman, well i was never a DC fan in the past and i can't say that i'm too excited about the prospect of the movie. I'll watch it when it comes out no doubt but it is hardly keeping me awake at night with excitement.
Basically, with the exception of Serenity, i'm looking at a very Joss-lite period ahead so it would be great to know what Joss intends to do in the next year or so. Especially if that might include a change of heart regarding a return to the slayerverse.
The Arcane | March 14, 20:52 CET
I used to think the wait between seasons was too long. But now, even if Joss works steadily in movies, it's going to be a year between projects at best. I don't want to sound selfish, because I know writing and directing movies is something Joss wants to do, but I miss my weekly fix.
Frankly, I don't even care what he does. Serenity II, Slayerverse, a movie about mimes learning to clog dance, whatever. Just wish I had something to look forward to after Serenity and AXM.
Give it up, Joss! We won't tell anyone what you're working on. ;)
Dizzy | March 14, 21:06 CET
NekoDono | March 14, 21:20 CET
Does this mean that we may have Joss doing Wonder Woman?
(smiles hopefully)
Emma Frost | March 14, 21:31 CET
SeanValen | March 14, 22:00 CET
Simon | March 14, 22:48 CET
Granted Joss directing would have been like the lovely chocolate syrup and a cherry on top.
Rogue | March 14, 23:09 CET
But i´m sad, i want Joss Whedon to do the job :(
[ edited by Angel TheVampire on 2005-03-14 21:18 ]
Angel TheVampire | March 14, 23:15 CET
I honestly can't see why there can't be both though. I mean Joss was willing to have three different twenty two episode a year shows running concurrently. Surely therefore doing a movie or two a year would not preclude him having at least television show on the go at the same time.
I don't know, i guess i've just become used to Workaholic Action Figure Joss and i'm being unfair in not expecting him to want a little downtime these days. I won't pretend that i don't want to see a new slayer type show happen as soon as possible but at the same time it should be when Joss is ready and willing. In the meantime i just hope he gets to make a movie that is his own creation again, like Serenity, rather than work on existing properties like X-Men or Wonder Woman, because no matter how good he is at doing those, i'll always look forward to seeing his own creations that little bit more.
The Arcane | March 14, 23:19 CET
However, this is not his only chance. Serenity is a massive opportunity and I think it will be successful. The series, although prematurely cancelled, sold very strongly on DVD (strong enough to have Universal buy the film rights!), was creatively unique and interesting, had a great and pretty unknown cast, and Joss behind it.
The film, therefore, already has a lot of support from the studio. Joss will be pulling out all the stops because it is his baby and he is extremely passionate about making it a great film. The production values will be much higher than those of the TV series. The cast will benefit from being largely unknown by a mainstream audience, just look at the Desperate Housewives, who have become well known based on the strength of half a season of a great show. All this will combine to make an amazing film which will benefit all of us fans.
Also, if the film is as successful as I hope, there could be a trilogy, and it would also open the possibility of future Buffy/Angel films. I know people haven't discussed it too much, but if Joss was able to pull this off it would inspire more confidence in him to make an even bigger hit film from one of his other two series which were much more firmly established than Firefly was. Even if it doesn't lead instantly to a B/A film, it could open up other big projects to Joss which would also give him the fame and money required to fund more B/A/F films or TV specials.
And Wonderwoman could be a possibility. I am a little more reluctant about it though, as I can imagine it going down the Catwoman path. If Joss is at the helm I don't think it will though.
Razor | March 14, 23:41 CET
Krall the Conqueror | March 15, 00:31 CET
Christopher | March 15, 01:37 CET
batmarlowe | March 15, 02:07 CET
- Singer had only two "big-budget" films to his name before taking on the X-Men movies. Admittedly, one of them was The Usual Suspects, which buys you a hell of a lot of cred in my book.
- Vaughn has been involved as producer in a number of Guy Ritchie's films -- though "producer" is an ambigous title.
P.S. If he can avoid the Guy Ritchie fast-forward digital effects in X-Men 3, I'd appreciate it.
P.P.S. If you can't cast Vinnie Jones as a mutant, God help you.
[ edited by bookrats on 2005-03-15 00:09 ]
bookrats | March 15, 02:08 CET
Oh wait. He already did that! Well, whaddaya know! =) X-Men 3 would have been a step backward in Whedon's career I think. To my reckoning, it's a good thing the rumors proved false.
ZachsMind | March 15, 02:15 CET
I want him to do his original ideas, but frankly I am not on the edge of my seat waiting for a new tv show or any Buffyverse movies. I'd rather he breathe new life into an already brilliant idea than limit himself to the one concept. I want NEW whedon. And I'd love to see him become a prolific screenwriter/director. TV was never my favorite medium, and it is a great credit to Joss that I love his work DESPITE the medium.
Do we really trust CHUD? I will pout and deny until Joss himself congratulates the new guy. *pout*
pixxelpuss | March 15, 02:49 CET
But I just mostly wish him the greatest success. We all know how fantastic he is and it's time the world knew it too! Here's hoping Serenity is his stepping stone to bigger and better things!
Firefly Flanatic | March 15, 03:52 CET
so I was surprised anyone still thought he might do X-men.
Joss also said (last October)that he was working on a totally new script -
not based on anything he has ever done before -
so maybe he'll end up selling that to a studio.
I'm pretty sure Joss Whedon can find things he wants to do.
embers | March 15, 04:06 CET
I believe one of the key problem is that with most big budget films now, the studio execs want directors that do what their told and make cookie-cutter movies designed to appeal to the masses and that are re-edited at the whims of test audiences. It isn't like our Joss to make films like that, and I can see producers and studios unwilling to trust him with a 100 million dollar movie. Not saying that that's right, but I think that might be the problem Joss is facing, especially doing these superhero films.
FaithFan | March 15, 05:08 CET
catalyst2 | March 15, 06:48 CET
Harmalicious | March 15, 08:25 CET
prospero | March 15, 11:06 CET
Kris | March 15, 17:46 CET
It's sort of Catch 22, I think it is a good idea for Joss to rest and work on other ideas in order to rejuvenate himself creatively towards B/A, however I think the problem is that B/A projects would need to be undertaken within the next few years, as although us true fans will be interested, a lot of the casual audience the shows had built and even the general public's awareness of the verse's existance would have decreased. Plus, the vampire characters might be a little unrealistic as the actors playing them age. So in those respects it is better to strike sooner rather than later.
I also find it strange that David Boreanaz has stated he would only be interested in Angel if it were taken to another level, presumably he is talking about feature films. But although that would still be better than nothing, and it would have its advantages, such as a bigger budget and a greater likelihood of more people taking notice of a successful film rather than a TV show. As we have seen with cult films like Donnie Darko, word of mouth can open them to a much wider audience.
However, part of the problem with feature films is that the character development is limited to a couple of hours. That could be considered merely a challenge, but one of the main strengths of Whedon-verse shows is their long term development over many seasons, and films just don't have that. So in many ways what Boreanaz might view as a progression would be more than likely a regression, an inferior form of the TV series. I still think it would be good exposure and open up further chances of the show being resurrected in other forms, but in general it would be very hard to match the storytelling quality of the show itself.
Although I do think that there is little point in returning to either show in any form unless there are exciting stories to tell. I have faith in Joss and his vision that he would make them worthwhile, but there is the possibility of B/A returning in some form and really having nothing to achieve. Both shows ended on excellent form and unless a new incarnation of B/A could match that it would be pointless. But I think if anyone could do it, Joss can.
Razor | March 15, 20:43 CET