June 07 2005
Mixed reviews for 'The Inside'.
Zap2it's TV Gal says "It's an intriguing premise.... But I will need to see some improvement before I recommend it.". And the SF Examiner TV critic doesn't hold back with her criticism "I expected more from the show's creators... Skip it.".
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.


Angela | June 07, 11:01 CET
Madhatter | June 07, 11:41 CET
I'm assuming Herc will do an article on the show, and we'll use that for the basis of the discussion. Further discussions of future episodes will be held over at our Flickr group. Though when Amber's episodes airs, we may do a front page discussion for that as well.
Simon | June 07, 12:37 CET
phlebotinin | June 07, 15:41 CET
angel fan | June 07, 15:41 CET
Genia | June 07, 17:39 CET
Philly Inquirer says:
As gruesomely intriguing as 24 is violently exciting
each episode is a fascinating whodunit
But one thing's plain as day. The Inside adds a shock-o-licious chill to the hot nights of summer.
The stunning Rachel Nichols ... is at once ethereal and haunted.
http://news.cincypost.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050603/LIFE/506030340/1005
"The Inside" (June 8, Fox): The last thing we need is a new cop show, but this tale of a special FBI unit that investigates serial crimes is full of wicked good twists and turns and great characters including Peter Coyote's amoral chief. Newcomer Rachel Nichols is excellent as a child-abduction victim who grows up to be an FBI profiler.
And there was a USA Today one in another post, somewhere.
I'm thinking it's a taste issue.
Allyson | June 07, 18:30 CET
Speaking of taste and reviews, let us all not forget that Firefly didn't get across the board great reviews when it premiered. Firefly reviews were decidedly mixed. How very wrong the negative reviewers were.
phlebotinin | June 07, 18:53 CET
And I just wonder if Fox hadn't insisted on keeping Rachel Nichols, would it have a better chance? A show like this is totally dependant on the lead. I'll reserve judgement when I see her.
FaithFan | June 07, 19:47 CET
Easing into the meat of the series seems judicious after the way he got screwed before, and something this ick-focused isn't going to be everyone's cuppa. Presuming the underlying premise and execution are sound, I just hope this is the actual strategy, and that it works well enough to keep the show on until it can a) find its audience, b) work out any minor kinks, and c) get into the more substantial elements of the storyline.
Wiseblood | June 07, 22:19 CET
Gunn 2 N's | June 07, 22:33 CET
MySerenity | June 07, 22:42 CET
So good. I love this show.
Allyson | June 07, 23:34 CET
I'll give it the first episode, but if it's truly Blood and Bits 'R Us, I'm out of there.
Daromaius | June 08, 01:30 CET
Forgive me but I don't get how anyone could've been into a Joss Whedon show and hate too much blood.
[ edited by eddy on 2005-06-07 23:42 ]
eddy | June 08, 01:41 CET
I apologise now for going off topic, but am I the only person who thought 'Point Pleasant' was absolutely tremendous?
alien lanes | June 08, 02:46 CET
Paul_Rocks | June 08, 04:54 CET
electricspacegirl | June 08, 05:11 CET
And this is bad... how? I love my Timmy (and my Jayne)!
:P
PurpleYoshi | June 08, 05:28 CET
TamaraC | June 08, 09:34 CET
*In all fairness to The Shield, I haven't seen that yet.
Daromaius | June 08, 23:29 CET