Fast National Ratings for the premiere of 'The Inside'.
Zap2it says the show debuted to a 3.2/5. Mediaweek says it "kicked-off with a modest (and fourth-place) 3.8/ 6 in the overnights".
It's been that bloody long since we've done a ratings thread here. Any road, we're not doing a ratings thread for the show every week. But I think people will be interested to see how a show which has Minear, Espenson, Fury and Edlund on board did last night ratings wise. I mean thats kinda like the TV equivalent of Lennon, McCartney, Harrison and Starr.
Personally, I think Fox did not promote this show well. There were very few interviews with the cast or crew and the website is lack lustre.
June 09 2005
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.


Gunn 2 N's | June 09, 20:32 CET
All of which is to say - I'm not surprised it got off to a lackluster start ratings-wise.
I agree that it doesn't bode well for the show's future. The mixed critical response also doens't help – sometimes great reviews can help convinvce a network to keep a show on longer and try to find it an audience, but i think bad ratings plus mixed reviews will make it an uphill battle.
I hope i'm wrong. I still haven't seen it - i was out last night, though i taped the show to watch later.
acp | June 09, 20:42 CET
charisma | June 09, 20:48 CET
http://tv.zap2it.com/tveditorial/tve_main/1,1002,276|95696|1|,00.html
charisma | June 09, 20:53 CET
killinj | June 09, 20:59 CET
charisma | June 09, 21:17 CET
ShotgunWes | June 09, 21:18 CET
FOX had several promos going for it for the last few weeks.
Minear said that there would be a very blatant Angel reference in the pilot. So what was it?
There was a security guard who worked for 'Wolfram Security'.
Rogue Slayer | June 09, 21:27 CET
Simon | June 09, 21:28 CET
I quite enjoyed The Inside. It was very dark and rugged but I thought you got to know the characters fairly well in 45 minutes. Some of the dialog was kind of "Whedonish" it some places.
It is in no way a substitut for ANGEL but it beats a lot of other shows on TV right now.
Jonas | June 09, 21:33 CET
Calledon | June 09, 21:40 CET
Just gearing myself up for getting my hopes dashed again.
Biff Turkle | June 09, 21:43 CET
Katie Finneran had nothing to do this time - I hope she gets meatier stuff in future eps. I missed the Wolfram Security reference - I thought the Angel reference was the quick cut, subliminal image transitions which I always thought were cool.
gingeriffic | June 09, 22:55 CET
Actually I believe the reference was to a young blood woman getting ready to enter her apartment being startled by her landlord who was waiting at her door. After being startled the young woman said "Lurk much?"
Also I liked it. It was a pilot episode so there were some mis-steps and some occassional jumps in logic, but I think the potential was really there. I really like all of the characters, and I think there's much potential for growth. I thought the premise was good, and particularly liked the fate of the agent that Rebecca Locke replaces. I like the exchange between Rebecca and the apparent male lead in the elevator where he posited that Web looked for something in each of his employees that he himself lacked. I think that's some a typically wonderful Minear-esque quality for a character to have.
[ edited by ringworm on 2005-06-09 21:03 ]
ringworm | June 09, 22:59 CET
spikeangellover | June 09, 23:00 CET
Actually I believe the reference was to a young blood woman getting ready to enter her apartment being startled by her landlord who was waiting at her door. After being startled the young woman said "Lurk much?"
Sorry, that's a Buffy reference. Sneaky, that Minear!
Maeve | June 09, 23:13 CET
Willowy | June 09, 23:18 CET
ringworm | June 09, 23:28 CET
Whatever! That was the reference.
Geez.
Willowy | June 09, 23:44 CET
ringworm | June 09, 23:47 CET
Simon | June 10, 00:04 CET
Didn't catch any "references" and don't mind if I miss them. With that many buffy verse folks involved though I've no doubt we'll see much more "buffy speak" like "Lurk much" and other probably unintentional similarities.
I'm hopeful this show can stand on it's own if given half a chance.
[ edited by Grace on 2005-06-09 22:17 ]
Grace | June 10, 00:07 CET
The actual reference is in hidden text.
I enjoyed the show. No one delivers sarcasm better than Adam Baldwin, and Peter Coyote delivers that dry humor that I love so much. "Oops, I got that backwards". lol
ASassyKat | June 10, 00:09 CET
ringworm | June 10, 00:14 CET
rabid | June 10, 00:41 CET
Mort | June 10, 01:31 CET
zeitgeist | June 10, 01:38 CET
Harmalicious | June 10, 07:07 CET
WheelsOfJoy | June 10, 07:15 CET
Kris | June 10, 10:14 CET
Jonas | June 10, 16:52 CET
I am kind of on the fence with this show. Love Minear and Espenson and Fury, so I will stick around... but it still felt very predictable and procedural cop drama. But, since I plan on giving DB's show a chance this fall, I might as well get used to it. :)
Miko | June 10, 18:30 CET
bobster | June 10, 23:50 CET
Yes the transitions were very Angel like and made me smile, as did some of AB's line which reminded me of Jayne.
Passion | June 11, 01:26 CET
Willowy | June 11, 01:52 CET