June 30 2005
Sean Maher talks Serenity fandom.
In this Spacecast.com video clip, he says "I'm still not used to the fan reaction". Bless. Most of the trailer is shown in this clip, so if you're trying to remain totally unspoiled stay away.
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.


nna_funk | June 30, 12:35 CET
SpikeBad | June 30, 17:48 CET
A little - okay, more than a little - off-topic: to those who loved Firefly and haven't written a glowing review of it at Amazon (US), if you have a moment, now would be a good time to write one. There's a rather unfortunate and potentially persuasive review that now appears as the newest review on the front page of the Firefly listing. It'd be nice to push this guy's review off the main page so that all the newbies who are apparently checking out Firefly DVDs in droves these days don't read this. A little obsessive fan of me to suggest this, I know (see above, re: Sean Maher, heh), but these days good publicity for Firefly/Serenity seems extraordinarily important. If I weren't already a Firefly/Joss fan, I probably wouldn't know that Serenity was a gleam in anyone's eye. I wish Universal would start heavily promoting the movie.
To add to SpikeBad's comment above, I saw Batman Begins yesterday in large part to see the Serenity trailer on the big screen. It was not shown. The Dukes of Hazzard movie was. I was extraordinarily annoyed. That Christian Bale, though. I rather like him. Great "supporting" cast, too.
phlebotinin | June 30, 18:00 CET
The channel is actually called "Space", not "spacecast", it's just when they started up the domain name space.com was already taken. Also yes, Space is Canada's sci-fi channel. They have been pretty big promoters of Firefly as it's done quite well on their channel. That small video clip aired 5 or 6 times during the day in their little news clips that they run between shows. Meanwhile Space continues to air repeats of Firefly on Thursday nights at 11 pm.
Matt_Fabb | June 30, 19:53 CET
Sean Maher's teeth are very white.
phlebotinin | June 30, 20:06 CET
Continuing off-topic-ness, I checked out the Amazon review, and it is a little galling, but 3 out of 5 stars is hardly a "bad" review, now. No worries, it's well on the way down the page and will be off the front in a day or so. Heh.
nemo | June 30, 20:11 CET
quick thought:
zombies shamble across bridge, one of the patrol crew takes aim and the main character stops him.
'No, they are just looking for somewhere to go, just like us'
No, they are looking for brains and internal organs to chew on like bloody bubblegum. Spare me, please, Mr. Romero.
zeitgeist | June 30, 20:14 CET
Also click that the review was NOT helpfull. Just sayin' :)
SpookyRiverFan | June 30, 21:41 CET
Lioness | June 30, 23:10 CET
Chris inVirginia | June 30, 23:15 CET
Chris inVirginia | June 30, 23:17 CET
I regret making it sound like I wanted to effectively silence the three-star reviewer on Amazon. His review was hardly of the "Joss sux; Firefly sux" variety and was actually rather thoughtful, even if I don't agree with it. That said, it's always nice to read a well-written, favorable review of Firefly, which yours was, CiV.
phlebotinin | July 01, 00:17 CET