"Darkness Falls... on it's Face,"
says one critic. Very little praise has amounted from Emma Caulfield's latest movie, "Darkness Falls."
Jonathan Foreman of the New York Post says the film "could just as well have been titled 'Dumb Then Dumber' for the way its plot makes decreasing sense even by the low standards of B horror flicks."
One reviewer (Jon Popick of Planet Sick-Boy) has even called Darkness Falls "even worse than Kangaroo Jack."
Ouch! That's harsh.
January 25 2003
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.


"...as long as crap makes money, studios will continue to make crap."
All these criticisms do is encourage the demographic that this movie is aimed at. It encourages them to watch it.
"Stay in the light. When the lights are on, after all, this movie won't be shown."
Anyone under 40 knows that if a critic says something's bad, you have to see it. If nothing more than out of principle: to prove the columnists wrong.
"The only scary thing about this movie would be the price of any admission to go see it."
However, this same demographic that the film aims at doesn't have the kinda money to go see every movie that makes it to a movie theater. Most of them hold out for stuff like Lord of the Rings and X-Men2.
"A dreary exercise in cheap shocks aimed at kids."
Darkness Falls will make good money in video rentals. That's probably why it was made.
ZachsMind | January 25, 07:46 CET
voodoo_daddy | January 25, 09:31 CET
David Nabbit | January 25, 11:46 CET
Jack Gladney | January 25, 12:08 CET
Good horror movies, by their very nature, are terrifying and not for young minds. Best horror movie I have seen in years was Event Horizon *has flashback to being terrified by Sam Neil's eyes*.
Simon | January 26, 02:52 CET