MTV reports on latest Spike movie rumours.
Their interpretation of Alyson Hannigan's latest remarks is that it's headed for the big screen. However James' manager says the project is "nothing we have on our radar at this moment." Also click here to read a brief blurb about what Kristen has to say about a Spike movie.
It's not difficult to spell someone's last name properly. Especially as Marsters is already spelt correctly in the article before hand.
August 04 2005
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.


Madhatter | August 04, 18:03 CET
It's funny, I didn't James Marsters and James Marsden had the same manager. That must be confusing. *end sarcasm*
MySerenity | August 04, 18:10 CET
What we know is that it would be Spike/Illy/Fred and include Amy Acker, as in June he had talked to both. Fury said they had talked about it and Joss was really intrested in doing the superchick thing. But not now.
This is not the first time some article or the press have confused Mardsen and Marsters. Some did it last year when reporting info on the newest x-men gossip. Now with one in the movie and one in smallville, I can see how they could get confused. Though reading through Copy, should take care of that problem as they are two different actors.And they "called" one of their's agent. Hmm wonder which one????Hehehe
Can picture Joss gettting the daily new Buffyverse rumor and laughing.
[ edited by FalenAnjl on 2005-08-04 16:38 ]
FalenAnjl | August 04, 18:36 CET
Nebula1400 | August 04, 19:02 CET
lynnie | August 04, 19:05 CET
The ten eps were reported the day the rumors first started coming out,on this site, infact.
Jm and Kryptonsite both reported him being in the first ep last week.
And we all know he talked to Joss early in June, Along with Amy. Since then Fury and Everyone else has said nothing is in the works.
So like the JM's SV news, she has already been internet scooped so far with her tidbits.
FalenAnjl | August 04, 19:13 CET
nixygirl | August 04, 19:23 CET
kathylovesspike | August 04, 19:48 CET
Though it has been pointed out that James has himself mentioned it would he would be up for a role in a big screen Buffy flick.
[ edited by Simon on 2005-08-05 00:32 ]
Simon | August 04, 19:53 CET
Big screen would be good. Hey it could have Angel and Spike again. Nothing wrong with two hot, sexy vampires leading the way. They could get a slayer in Faith and maybe Dana, a mystic with Fred/Illyara,Watcher with Wes.(He is not dead!)and the resident troublemaker in Conner.
But hmm... who would be the stable one? Must bring Lorne in then.
FalenAnjl | August 04, 20:06 CET
Or maybe something new has happened with this latest interveiw....we can hope I guess. I'll take any speculation of more Spike and James and be grateful for it. I doubt I'm alone in that sentiment....
What I gathered is that Kristin got an interview with James, and it will be posted on Aug. 19. There is more behind her post than the current internet rumors.
[ edited by Nebula1400 on 2005-08-05 01:13 ]
Nebula1400 | August 04, 20:25 CET
Now there is nice family talk I would kill to have seen. Him, Spike and Angel sitting down to talk to Conner about life. With questions From Blue and commentary by Faith. heheheh
FalenAnjl | August 04, 20:33 CET
While I would love to see Spike and Illyria together...I would hope they don't dilute the movie out with too many characters. A movie, even a big screen one, can only cover so much material, and I don't want Spike's role to fade out with too much else going on. I'd rather they made several movies, and concentrated on each character as was originally suggested. To me that would make for a much more satisfying film. They could all tie into each other, but still keep the MAIN character's story front and center.....too many characters and you start wondering just what the whole story is about....IMHO.
kathylovesspike | August 04, 20:38 CET
Now which four characters would that revolve around.
Spike/Illyria (since the talk is them deffinatly hooked together for a movie)
Faith/Wes(even ghosty wes)
Giles
Conner or Gunn????
And if not four then one tv movie.. Faith/Spike/Illyria/Wes.
FalenAnjl | August 04, 20:44 CET
Right?
Jonas | August 04, 21:13 CET
killinj | August 04, 21:15 CET
SeanValen | August 04, 21:29 CET
killinj | August 04, 21:40 CET
At the same time, I'd also like to see Fray brought to life as well.
Emma Frost | August 04, 21:44 CET
The Spike movie is for the Wb.
Fray would be a great way to restart the universe if Joss were to come to tv again, series wise.
FalenAnjl | August 04, 21:47 CET
still...if it helps get a Spike movie...I'd tell him anything, and Joss too.....
Lets just hope this is good news and not just more speculation. Although any news this keeps getting is still worth the noise...right???
kathylovesspike | August 04, 21:52 CET
WhoIsOmega? | August 04, 21:56 CET
killinj, wtf, oh...i just happened to run into drew....you kill me.
Fray as a series....I'm salivating.
I always thought Lorne and Fred were the most stable. Xander until season 5.
Harmalicious | August 04, 22:31 CET
Simon | August 04, 22:56 CET
killinj That's the kind of thing I was talking about. That JW wants this movie to happen is a good sign. When he gets his teeth into something it usually gets done. *thinks of Btvs tv show, Firefly movie, hopefully Spike movie* :0)
The original four tv movies were going to be: Spike, Angel, Giles and Willow. Faith wasn't an option as ED was doing Tru Calling at the time.
lynnie | August 04, 22:59 CET
Moscow Watcher | August 04, 23:11 CET
Bad Kitty | August 04, 23:27 CET
killinj - Dang! If I met Drew Goddard, I think I'd be dancing around with a big "I met Drew Goddard" sign stuck to my forehead. That man is just... so very brilliant, funny... pretty...
Joss' bitch | August 05, 01:49 CET
At the same con, JM said he was still keen and that he thought Spike/Illyria was the way forward for a movie. Neither talked about TV movie/big screen/direct-to-DVD issues except for JM to say that any format was OK by him.
Interestingly, when asked the same question on the Sunday, David Fury was very much vaguer about his answer whilst JM's was much the same.
catalyst2 | August 05, 04:29 CET
Apocalypse | August 05, 14:37 CET
Big screen, small screen it's all good. I'm not the sort of person who thinks big screen equals quality and small screen equals badness. I've seen enough big screen movies to know that's not true. :-) I don't look down my nose on tv movies at all.
lynnie | August 05, 16:28 CET
Simon | August 05, 16:40 CET