Boreanaz talks 'Bones' to TV Guide.
And as usual there's the 'will you return to Angel' question. David says "the only way it would work for me is if it was a full-length feature film directed by Joss Whedon or Tim Minear or David Greenwalt. It would have to be on an upper-scale level, not a TV thing."
Though Angel on Broadway would be a hoot and oddly enough would probably work quite well.
August 10 2005
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.


jpr | August 10, 12:27 CET
Simon | August 10, 12:29 CET
[ edited by SeanValen on 2005-08-10 12:51 ]
[ edited by SeanValen on 2005-08-10 12:52 ]
SeanValen | August 10, 14:40 CET
In other words - it ain't gonna happen. :(
Which Witch | August 10, 14:52 CET
[ edited by SeanValen on 2005-08-10 12:59 ]
SeanValen | August 10, 14:55 CET
I'm sorry, sometimes I feel he's gotten a little too big for his boots. I also thought it was nice of the journalist to translate Boreanaz speak for the masses ;)
I honestly could not understand a word of what he said last time I saw him interviewed.
nixygirl | August 10, 16:07 CET
killinj | August 10, 17:00 CET
SeanValen | August 10, 17:29 CET
He's cutting off his nose to spite his face. Too bad it's not for us to decide, we'd make the right choices for ya, Dave!
Willowy | August 10, 18:11 CET
I appreciate his honesty about what it would take for him to make an Angel movie. While the rest of us know anything Joss does would be great, he's comfortable saying he's not interested in a TV movie. Given that his show was cancelled and the TV movies were dangled as a carrot to placate angry fans, I don't blame him.
looking | August 10, 18:53 CET
Simon | August 10, 18:58 CET
TheZeppo | August 10, 20:03 CET
Willowy | August 10, 20:08 CET
killinj | August 10, 20:29 CET
Regarding an Angel movie...I don't think that will ever happen. David is moving forward...he does not seem to want to continue that character, which I can completely understand. Believe me...Angel was my favorite character...so I would LOVE for him to continue...but I think that is asking too much. He definitely wants to broaden his scope...it's only natural and I wish him all the luck in the world. I hold on to hope that at some time there will be a continuation of the Buffyverse, in what ever form that it will take. That's all we can do. Hope.
Coll | August 10, 20:54 CET
IMMORTAL | August 10, 21:28 CET
[ edited by TheZeppo on 2005-08-10 19:59 ]
TheZeppo | August 10, 21:59 CET
I am so NOT on board with the idea of no more 'verse. I will hope and wish for years to come if need be.
Willowy | August 10, 22:02 CET
Angel could get the shanshu, and then he could age. Perfect.
April | August 10, 22:33 CET
nychick | August 11, 00:23 CET
And I have no issues with DB if he doesn't want to come back to the role of Angel. I loved his portrayal and if he isn't into it anymore that's okay. I think there is plenty of possible storylines that JW can do that he probably could start a whole new series based in the 'verse that doesn't include any known characters. I always thought the character of Whistler was very intriguing and interesting and he was only shown for a very short time. And if they hadn't killed off Caleb, he could've been an interesting character to have delved more into his background. That would be a twist to have Joss do a spin-off that was from the perspective of the bad guy. That was one of the reasons why I loved Spike and Dru so much. They were obviously bad guys but they were also so interesting and fun to watch that you kind of routed for them sometimes too. I remember Spike taking that first step out of the wheelchair and I actually cheered! Yet, he was the bad guy! Anyway, my point is, Joss can easily make any character dynamic and interesting and it doesn't necessarily have to be a character that has already been introduced. I never really warmed up to Point Pleasant but if the show had been focused on the Boyd character I probably would've liked it a lot better. More of him trying to entice this girl to the dark side and her as the secondary character trying to fight it.
Firefly Flanatic | August 11, 00:37 CET
ETA: I forgot.
"I always thought the character of Whistler was very intriguing and interesting and he was only shown for a very short time."
Ok so I really splurged the other day when I got BG Season One. Please know I don't get out as much as I should. I was looking at all the HBO titles I see mentioned here but shooooweeeee they all cost about 83.00 US apiece. I'll have to analyze that list much further but when that day comes it will most likely be Dead Like Me. So I picked up the first & second season, packaged together, of Homicide: Life on the Street. It's a cop show one CAN watch multiple times and not yawn. It's the best cop show that ever was and I haven't gotten into another one since. So I can't remember his name off hand, but there's Whistler. He's not the same character, but he interestingly has basically the same look on Homicide. He's really interesting character on that show. He does some of the cop videos and is dying to make documentaries. I loved Whistler instantly because I recognized him from Homicide and enjoyed him very much in that series. I wouldn't recommend any other cop show on this forum except this one. It outshines all the others by a mile, even NYPD Blue and that one was darn good. Phenomenal tv acting, scripting and filming. Often looks like a documentary because one of the creators did documentaries and that's probably why the "Wistler" character is there, at times for some comedic relief.
ETA: It should say something that I remember him so well. His name is Max Perlich and he was only on Homicide for one of its seven seasons, 96-97 according to IMBD. I still totally recommend Homicide for some serious quality tv viewing, however. I'm happy to have the DVDs because I only caught eps here and there in reruns.
[ edited by April on 2005-08-11 04:36 ]
[ edited by April on 2005-08-11 04:49 ]
April | August 11, 06:27 CET
Are you forgetting the travesty of "The Inside?"
TheZeppo | August 11, 09:22 CET
Tim Minear said that Fox wanted “a” procedural. I am thinking what Fox is saying around the production meeting table is:
‘we need “one” procedural in the line up to tick the required box and we don’t care what it is, but Bones has a much better chance of succeeding than the Inside because it has a prebuilt audience through the books and it looks easy on the eye and it has that CSI lookalike thing going, blah blah…, so that’s the one we push and give a real chance (for this read, we’ll broadcast 3 instead of the usual 2 episodes). The Inside is already in the pipeline and no point stopping it now, so we throw it out there on the off chance it works but really we don’t care whether it lives or dies.’
Basically what I am saying is Bones killed the Inside. Which is ironic on so many different levels.
Oh yeah, and I want an Angel big screen movie more than just about anything in the world. Except possibly world peace. Then again maybe an Angel movie would bring world peace, everybody being in the cinema and having no time to fight and all that. Ever thought about that Joss? Hmmm? Hmmm?
miranda | August 11, 13:48 CET
Also, I always figured the dry-erase caseboard in AtS season 2 was based on Homicide's caseboard.
Miranda, if the hoped-for Angel movie brought Jasmine back, world peace would be a cinch.
jaynelovesvera | August 11, 19:10 CET
batmarlowe | August 11, 23:10 CET