Joss mentioned but not chosen for the Guardian’s first time director award.
This article gives brief descriptions of the films considered for the first directors award at the EIFF.
The reason given is that "it seemed against the spirit of the award to recognise not only someone who is already a household name, but also whose film is derived from already well-known filmed material."
August 29 2005
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.


theonetruebix | August 29, 05:13 CET
impalergeneral | August 29, 05:18 CET
Or maybe the writer just made a mistake. I like the first idea better.
Biff Turkle | August 29, 05:25 CET
Seriously. Steven Spielberg is a household name. Ron Howard and Clint Eastwood are household names. Woody Allen, Martin Scorsese. Soderbergh and Tarantino, and Tim Burton. And I think Christopher Nolan will end up as one. But that's about it, in America. Joss Whedon is not a household name. I'd never heard of the man before Buffy's Season 6 premiere pulled me headlong into the world of the Slayer. And if I've never heard of them, as much entertainment as I watch, chances are good most of America hasn't either. (Please note that this ONLY applies to TV and movies. Red Hot Chili who now?)
BAFfler | August 29, 05:52 CET
impalergeneral | August 29, 05:56 CET
[EDIT] And GEORGE LUCAS, come to think of it...although let's face it, with the movies he's turned out lately, he has absolutely no right to be. I dream of the day when his personal incarnations of the Good (Indiana Jones), the Bad (Darth Vader), and the Ugly (Howard the Duck) will all come to life and join forces to hand that man his ass.
[ edited by BAFfler on 2005-08-29 04:13 ]
BAFfler | August 29, 06:10 CET
impalergeneral | August 29, 06:14 CET
Back to the subject, at hand, it's a bit demoralizing but overall, I think that Serenity will benefit from the exposure and the largely positive press it is receiving from its inclusion at the EIFF. However, I agree with BAFfler and impalergeneral, Joss Whedon just isn't a household name here in North America (in my household, yes, but in that of the larger society? no). Also, "well-known filmed material"? That's a debatable assertion as well; so let's debate it. Any takers?
gorramit | August 29, 06:24 CET
impalergeneral | August 29, 06:33 CET
In other words, they only know it because "Family Guy" took a swipe at FOX.
BAFfler | August 29, 06:35 CET
BAFfler, at least Lucas gave us a "Willow" movie. (I didn't say a good "Willow" movie).
BTW, read that guy's article and did see: it sucked.
jaynelovesvera | August 29, 07:18 CET
And I like it that the paper gave its award to a U.S. director, given that the Grauniad can sometimes be painfully anti-American, or at least, so politically correct as to elevate the obscure but worthy over the established genius.
SoddingNancyTribe | August 29, 07:30 CET
(I'm better now. Breathe, BAFfler, breathe.)
Certainly the Guardian would be referring to Britain, but I seriously doubt that most people on the streets of the UK would know who he is. Although, now that I write that, I'm thinking about the Buffy featurette where Amber Benson laughingly recalls being mobbed ("Oh my God, it's Tara from Buffy!" in a cute faux-British accent) and realizing I may have to rethink the matter.
However, there's no question but that JW is an established director. He's turned out the most visually interesting "set piece" episodes of television that I've ever seen. So, fair enough, he's done it before. But c'mon! Just a little fan love from that side of the pond might have given Serenity a boost.
Still, after resurrecting a show from the dead, being able to say "We're Number Two!" ain't too gorram bad.
BAFfler | August 29, 07:45 CET
SoddingNancyTribe | August 29, 07:47 CET
Can't say as I hate Lucas, but I wish he'd stop making movies. Did he go so bad, or was he not that talented to begin with? These latter films are so bad I'm beginning to suspect someone else behind the scenes with influence might have been more responsible for the quality of the early work.
jaynelovesvera | August 29, 07:57 CET
Oh, and George Lucas can do anything he wants. Star Wars, 1977, twenty seven times in the theater.
I don't even care if he sucks for the rest of his career. Bought his way into Valhalla with that right there, baby.
Willowy | August 29, 09:37 CET
jaynelovesvera | August 29, 10:13 CET
Same here.
electricspacegirl | August 29, 10:31 CET
Willowy | August 29, 10:31 CET
I'm pleased Joss was mentioned in this article. And I agree that he isn't as well known in the US as he deserves to be. Most Americans only pay attention to directors in films, most don't even care who writes their favorite TV shows. Which is one area that makes the 'verse fans unique as we tend to know all the writers,ect. Anyway, I'm hope 'Serenity' will change that.
Madhatter | August 29, 15:40 CET
So, if I understand well the rules around here: actor bashing is forbidden, but director/producer bashing is welcome? ;)
In fact, I am following you here on the general opinion concerning Lucas (he is a *terrible* director (he even managed to make McGregor look like a bad actor!!)); his talent seems to be proportionnaly inverse to the sfx at his disposal. Anyhow, this is not a surprise if the best of the SW movies (The Empire Strikes Back) is not one he directed; I even learned that he was furious against Marquant for having changed one of the lines in this movie, making it one of the best (Han's answer "I know" to Leia's "I love you") on the contrary to the quite common version that was in the script (Han originaly answered "I love you too"...).
Le Comité | August 29, 16:34 CET
Good article indeed. Thanks for the link, Madhatter.
Le Comité | August 29, 16:42 CET
brownishcoat | August 29, 17:15 CET
Le Comité | August 29, 17:17 CET
Impossible | August 29, 17:29 CET
I agree that Joss is certainly not a household name. He is very well known by fans of any of his shows, or of other cult shows, and those who are very interested in TV or film, but not by the general public. I'm hoping he does see a lot of success but I don't want him to become a Spielberg or Lucas. In some ways, it would be great, because he could make anything he wants with amazing resources, but I think those sort of directors are also put under enormous pressure to deliver financially and commercially.
I think Joss would prefer to operate slightly below the radar, making moderately successful films/TV shows but not the typical Hollywood blockbusters, with emphasis on creativity and integrity rather than about making money. Kind of like how he has always been.
But it's strange that The Guardian seems to be portraying Serenity as some sort of Hollywood behemoth rather than the brilliant fan-supported underdog we have been supporting. As has been stated before, it was based on a TV show that was cancelled prematurely, so it's not like it was destined for commercial success.
Razor | August 29, 17:51 CET
Impossible, I agree. Joss is probably as muhc of a household name as you can get for that specific festival. I know in my house it is :)
Razor, I couldn't agree more about what you said about Joss' work. He would never sell out and make a film like The Island or Stealth with semi-big names in it just to make it and see how it does in the box office.
[ edited by MySerenity on 2005-08-29 15:55 ]
MySerenity | August 29, 17:53 CET
And, myself too, I found this thought not plausible; although I am sure Whedon has all the capacities to continue to write/direct/produce feature films, I can't think of him as one of those "big" directors. Probably because, to me, all these directors began to make bad (or "so-so") movies when they became "big" (I regularly watch Jaws, and I CAN'T realize that the same director made Jaws and Minority Report or Catch me if you can...).
Le Comité | August 29, 19:15 CET
Ugh, I HATE when people in TV/Film say "I love you too" in response to "I love you". It's so boring and it's one of my pet peaves.
I am not familiar with Star Wars but I read recently that it was Harrison Ford who ad-libbed that line. Did I read wrong?
electricspacegirl | August 29, 19:37 CET
Madhatter | August 29, 20:02 CET
Irvin Kershner directed Empire; Richard Marquand (not Marquant) directed Return of the Jedi.
As several of you noted, it was Harrison Ford's suggestion re the line, and Kersh was happy to go with it. Don't know whether GL was particularly unhappy about it, but I do have it from an extremely reliable source that Lucas's direction of actors consisted solely of him saying "yes, like that, but faster" . . .
SoddingNancyTribe | August 29, 22:12 CET
jaynelovesvera | August 29, 22:21 CET
Madhatter | August 30, 00:10 CET
Whilst I love Star Wars, I dislike how Lucas repeatedly returns to the Original Trilogy in order to extract money from fans. Or the examples of extreme merchandising. I thought the Original Trilogy was fantastic and the prequels were, on the whole satisfactory (if not entirely necessary) so I'm not dissing the man completely, because his ideas and stories are fantastic, it's just that his writing and directing is often sub-par, and I don't think he has really done much with his success.
Spielberg is kind of the opposite, he has made a lot of great films but also a lot of mediocre films, and I detest the sentimentalism that has to be injected into each of them. That's exactly where Joss would never succumb to what the audiences and the studios want, because he is original and unpredictable, and you get a range of themes which aren't dictated by what some marketing panel says. I'm not saying its entirely these people's faults, I think once you reach a certain level of fame its almost inevitable, but I don't think Joss will ever allow himself to be put in that position.
Razor | August 30, 21:08 CET