"And working up a load of sexual tension and prancing away like a magnificent poof is truly thanks enough."
September 06
2005
UIP Australia Releases Serenity Poster.
This provides the answer to our queries about the artwork with the recent Sydney Morning Herald article.
purplehazel
| Firefly&Serenity
| 06:44 CET
|
92 comments total
| tags: international, serenity, poster
You need to
log in to be able to post comments.
About
membership.
« Older
Melbourne Serenity Screening with ...
|
Serenity to be shown at Swedish Fa...
Newer »
© 2002 - 2008 - WHEDONesque.com
(
e-mail)
Individual posts are copyright their respective authors
This is a non-profit, unofficial website, not affiliated with Mutant Enemy, Inc., 20th Century Fox, Warner Brothers or UPN.
lalaa | September 06, 06:51 CET
bonzob | September 06, 06:53 CET
mnspnr | September 06, 06:56 CET
Shakespeare | September 06, 07:03 CET
impalergeneral | September 06, 07:14 CET
binkaboo | September 06, 07:16 CET
Dan Corson | September 06, 07:20 CET
Nebula1400 | September 06, 07:22 CET
Calledon | September 06, 07:29 CET
Mr Universe | September 06, 07:32 CET
purplehazel | September 06, 07:35 CET
Also, to the mainstream audience, if you read "From the creator of Buffy" and you see River as a young, slim warrior woman with sharp weapons, the whole thing suddenly looks like "Buffy In Space!". Not smart overal I think...
EdDantes | September 06, 07:39 CET
The ship isn't even in it - or Wash/Book :(
I don't understand this approach of a different poster/trailer for different audiences - the differences seem so marginal (especially with the trailers) that one wonders how they decide that one country needs to hear/see something different to get them excited.
CHRi5 | September 06, 07:40 CET
I don't think the position she's in is actually very useful, as a pre-attack pose. Very video-gamey, as lalaa said.
zencat | September 06, 07:41 CET
Describing this movie to some of my family might interest them, but if I mention it's by the creator of Buffy, I can already see the 'look' they'll get, and the fake "Oh, that's nice" and the slow disengagement. It's happened before. I'm sure my family aren't the only ones. I know they'll be thinking, "Oh, so there are vampires in it?..." Cuz people can be stupid.
And I know it's probably naive, but I'd like to think if you're a Buffy/Angel fan, you already know about Joss' connection to Firefly/Serenity, even if you're not a fan of this project.
Rogue Slayer | September 06, 07:50 CET
This shows nothing of the character or passion of the movie. Please fire the Australian publicist.
And am I alone in feeling just a bit tired of River being front and center with everything? "Oooh, hotchickkillingmachine!!PantPant" - spare me.
To me, she isn't nearly as important as Mal or Kaylee...dang, Inara is much more beautiful and has a much more interesting and mysterious story to tell than River.
Fie on this poster. It's too "Underworld" for our 'verse. I hate it. Boo.
Willowy | September 06, 07:56 CET
But then again, this has been embedded in the campaign from the start - with the trailers etc.
To me, as a fan of all Joss' work, it means that it will be smart and epic and beautifully written (which it is), but for non-believers, it may just negatively associate the movie with 'that Vampire show we didn't watch'.
CHRi5 | September 06, 07:57 CET
I have a number of friends who were fans of Buffy or Angel but knew nothing of Serenity till I started talking about arranging a group trip to the cinema. I say 'were fans' in the sense that they have great memories of the shows but do not currently follow Joss' news on the internet. I would still be among their ranks if I had not got myself a home computer - and in those circumstances I would find the Buffy mentions a definite draw.
ETA: It's the Buffy/Angel references that I applaude rather than the picture. Having seen the film I agree that the poster does not really catch its atmosphere but that's a hard thing to do and I thought the same of the blue one.
[ edited by purplehazel on 2005-09-06 06:12 ]
purplehazel | September 06, 08:09 CET
Now, for my opinion of the poster - it looks great for a movie poster but I don't think it feels at all like Firefly to me. River looks like she morphed into Buffy and Faith (Buffy's build and short skirt and Faith's hair and eyes) and Mal looks a bit like Angel standing there.
Firefly Flanatic | September 06, 08:11 CET
Mal'sGal | September 06, 08:11 CET
Firefly Flanatic | September 06, 08:13 CET
I was just watching WWE Raw. And they showed a small ad for Serenity. Not a trailer but one of those "tonight's show was brought to you by" things. What ticked me off is that the picture on the screen was JUST the Serenity font. Thats not going to attract people. Why did they get rid of the chinese circle?
eddy | September 06, 08:14 CET
SoddingNancyTribe | September 06, 08:15 CET
To be honest; not my cup of tea. But in truth, it isn't for me, it's for non fans.
In Australia I would say much of the cinema going public is between the ages of 15-35 and it'll catch them in an instant! Anyone under 20 will want to see it (see there's stuff blowing up) and anyone over 20 will most likely have heard about it before it comes out.
It's really nothing like Firefly and that's OK, cause as a movie poster, it will definately work.
I would definately look at that in a cinema and go see the movie just on that basis alone.
It looks like a kool sci/fi flick, a bit like Dune, count me in.
nixygirl | September 06, 08:22 CET
Zoic_Fan | September 06, 08:32 CET
Comparing the trailers to the posters, I don't think anyone with just a passing thought of "Hey that looks pretty interesting" after seeing the trailer is going to make a connection to the poster if they've got River in Mal's spot on the poster instead of how it is. *shrug*
Just my two cents.
I like this poster a lot. The weapons River has are off but, knowing from the trailers that the Reavers make an appearance, it makes me think maybe River kicked some Reaver-butt. ;-)
flashofgenius | September 06, 08:33 CET
I think that it will appeal to non fans, and that's who we want to come in - because the fans are already on board. I'm pretty happy with it.
ZuckerBaby | September 06, 08:37 CET
However, I'm seeing the movie in one month! yay! I wonder which poster will show up here in NZ?
vera | September 06, 08:39 CET
It conveys nothing about the movie! Nothing about the heart or the story or the feel or the vibe. It's bland and generic and shallow. Everything Serenity is NOT. I know I'm being somewhat strident but I'm really torked by this... imagery.
*does the Paul Giomatti frustrated arm swing thingy*
Willowy | September 06, 08:39 CET
Caroline | September 06, 08:46 CET
Hee hee.
Caroline I don't agree with you on the non sci/fi look.
It def has traces of Dune and dare I say even Star Wars (the desert).
[ edited by nixygirl on 2005-09-06 06:49 ]
nixygirl | September 06, 08:47 CET
Mr Universe | September 06, 08:54 CET
Neither of which, of course, makes sense for the movie.
The One True b!X | September 06, 08:56 CET
nixygirl | September 06, 08:58 CET
Yeah I tend to agree. It really gives a totally different idea about what this is. It kinda looks like fan art to me. Especially with the 'interface-arrows' in the 'E's. What the hell is that supposed to be anyway? Mal is barely recognisable, the ship (after which the movie is NAMED) is completely absent, that tagline is horrible.... Too much of it is not 'beautiful in it's simplicity' but more 'a bit half-finished' if you ask me.
The plot of the movie may evolve around River, but if Serenity has any one 'main' character (and it doesn't, really), it's Mal. River's aspects as a young sexy ass-kicker has it's appeal to large groups and demographics, sure. But that doesn't mean she has to be THAT much more important than anything else in the movie! She's also mostly a mystery to everyone, including us, so she's hardly the person we identify with.
I really think putting Nathan a little more front'n center forward is a better idea. I agree with Joss this guy could/should be the next Harrison Ford.
EdDantes | September 06, 09:01 CET
kipron | September 06, 09:13 CET
Zoic_Fan | September 06, 09:15 CET
Caroline | September 06, 09:27 CET
embers | September 06, 09:29 CET
Yea you do have a point there. I sppose that's sci/fi tho, but yea, not your traditional type.
I really hate the tagline on it. However it is better than the other one. I saw one with 'Time for some thrilling Heroics' and I thought that was a much much better tagline! I wish they'd used that hey.
nixygirl | September 06, 09:40 CET
Except that's from the series.
The One True b!X | September 06, 09:44 CET
spitefairy | September 06, 09:47 CET
And no Papyrus for us. Heh.
The First Weevil | September 06, 09:48 CET
Also, to my eye, it seems a blatent attempt to make this look like Buffy.
But the one thing I do like is the logo. It looks like a logo, rather then something someone typed on a computer (former graphic artist, here. If I had used a straight, common font to create a logo, I would've had unhappy clients).
Dizzy | September 06, 09:55 CET
I also get a sense that these people really do handle these weapons, whereas too many movie posters with kick-ass poses are just so much BS (you can quote me . . . , yup). Also those are not Star Wars-type weapons or Trekian clothes, which makes for a real unusual contrast with the futuristic element playing in the background.
Damn right I'd keep an eye on this movie after seeing the poster.
Drifter | September 06, 10:00 CET
Simon | September 06, 10:26 CET
Robogeek | September 06, 10:46 CET
Djungelurban | September 06, 11:06 CET
What about Jewel, Gina, Morena, Sean and Ron!
Apocalypse | September 06, 12:20 CET
Buffy was huge and very mainstream in the UK (it was one of the top ranking shows here at one point, which a lot of people don't seem to remember).
PS: The US version also has the same credits.
PPS: The movie Serenity is being compared to in terms of box office? Pitch Black.
[ edited by gossi on 2005-09-06 10:22 ]
gossi | September 06, 12:21 CET
Not especially hopeful:
Domestic: $39,240,659 (73.8%)
+ Overseas: $13,947,000 (26.2%)
= Worldwide: $53,187,659
The One True b!X | September 06, 12:36 CET
reidca | September 06, 12:47 CET
Simon | September 06, 12:56 CET
I remember Gina talking about poster shoots, from her interview to "The Signal" podcast.
Neat. I like this better than the "blue-ish" poster. Though I do miss the rest of the crew. I want Wash, Kayle, Simon and Book to be on the poster too.
Numfar PTB | September 06, 13:05 CET
gossi | September 06, 13:23 CET
jaynelovesvera | September 06, 13:58 CET
eddy | September 06, 14:27 CET
dottikin | September 06, 15:05 CET
Simon | September 06, 15:06 CET
I do like the new font for Serenity and I think "They Aim To Misbehave" is a bit better tag line than "The Future Is Worth Fighting For".
Matt_Fabb | September 06, 15:29 CET
Personally I can't wait for their rendition of "Spice up your life"
Apocalypse | September 06, 15:38 CET
gossi | September 06, 16:16 CET
Did anyone look at the credits at the bottom? It lists as Nathan Fillion, Alan Tudyk, Adam Baldwin, Summer Glau and Chitewel Elfejor.
The billing makes sense to me. Nathan is the lead. Alan and Adam are more recognizable box office names since they have had roles in other films. Summer's character is driving the story (from what I hear). And I guess Chitewel Eflejor is a up and coming talent who has some name recognition.
I agree that the Buffy and Angel reference should not be on the poster. Fans of those shows know who Joss is and know about Serenity. Non-fans may turn off on the movie because (as stated earlier) they think it is about vampires.
Passion | September 06, 16:26 CET
Apocalypse | September 06, 16:27 CET
MySerenity | September 06, 17:12 CET
Speaking of taglines, wouldn't "They can't take the sky from me" be better, and more evocative of the whole FF/Serenity thing?
Chris inVirginia | September 06, 17:14 CET
Paul_Rocks | September 06, 17:17 CET
palehorse | September 06, 17:33 CET
Chris inVirginia | September 06, 17:42 CET
Succatash | September 06, 18:22 CET
I’m not saying disagreement is bad, it’s just opened my eyes as to how people who watch the same things view them in different ways.
gossi | September 06, 19:04 CET
3...uh...31...I mean 154...uh...so many flavors of ice cream, Gossi. ;-)My first reaction to this poster was, "Oh, yuck!"
I understand I am not the targeted demographic so what I think doesn't matter, but I do worry that it is being presented as something that it is not and will therefore create disappointment amongst those going to see a futuristic psycho killer movie and miss the people who would really enjoy it.
newcj | September 06, 19:52 CET
nixygirl | September 06, 19:53 CET
[ edited by The Dark Shape on 2005-09-06 17:57 ]
The Dark Shape | September 06, 19:57 CET
I agree here. There are a lot of people out there who are Buffy and/or Angel fans who know little to nothing about Firefly and don't spend precious hours pouring over this stuff on the internet. They would be drawn to a movie by the creator of Buffy and Angel. Until two years ago, I would have fit into that category as well.
One of the eye opening things about these posters and the trailers has been the disagreement about things amongst people. The font is rubbish, the font is good. The logo is rubbish, the logo is good. The cast should be present, no they shouldn’t. The tag line is rubbish, no it’s great.
I’m not saying disagreement is bad, it’s just opened my eyes as to how people who watch the same things view them in different ways.
Which is the what we have to keep in mind, gossi. Nobody is ever going to create anything that everybody agrees on - so you just have to try to find the best way to hook people who will respond. Even though I'm not a teenager or a male, I would probably notice this poster more than the US poster. I actually don't mind that an image of Serenity isn't on the poster, because that is the least interesting aspect of the movie to me. Plus, it might be good to avoid images of flaming penises on posters.
Also, featuring everybody on the cast on the poster could make it too busy - and I get the impression they wanted something stark and focused. Very few movie posters actually portray or credit everyone in the cast. It doesn't mean they won't be in the movie. It just means the producers and PR people aren't as anal as a rabid cult following.
Nebula1400 | September 06, 20:14 CET
I do think they could have included the other cast members, perhaps went with the same style in a landscape poster, which could accomodate all of them. But who knows, perhaps for the poster that would be too cluttered, although it would be nice to see the other characters on it, I don't mind as long as they feature in enough of the film.
I think having someone like Book would make it a little more interesting as people may wonder why there is a preacher there, also if Inara didn't have a gun she would look a little more interesting, instead they all look like they're ready to kill. I think Inara could be bigger, too, because although Firefly fans can tell who it is, it would be very difficult for anyone else to see her face.
On the whole, I think perhaps this poster is better for promoting the film and I like it a little more, although I do like the other one. And I do think it deserves "From the Creator of Buffy and Angel." And anyone who thinks that their friends or relatives may be put off by the fact that it is associated with those beloved programs, just don't tell them. Hopefully they will see the film, enjoy it immensely, then tell them, and they will be more likely to respect Buffy and Angel.
Razor | September 06, 20:19 CET
River must have heard someone yelling "Mamoushka!"
(congrats to all five of you who get that Addams Family movie joke)
BloodyAwfulPoet | September 06, 20:20 CET
electricspacegirl | September 06, 20:26 CET
Not at all sure about this poster, really can't tell if I love it or hate it. Very different to what's come before.
Really not sure about having the "From the creator of Buffy and Angel" on there, the people that liked those shows, loved those shows and realized what well written TV it was. Some of the people I know that didnt like the show saw it as a chance for men to see an attractive young woman doing high kicks and wearing low tops, and Angel as the equivelant show that women could watch, the others just thought they were crap and I know for a fact will not give any consideration to paying to see a film created by the same guy.
Ghost Spike | September 06, 20:29 CET
Calledon | September 06, 20:49 CET
MySerenity | September 06, 20:52 CET
The marketing for the film is really starting to worry me. Where are the TV ads? With the return of Lost and the premieres of a few other possibly hit sci-fi/fantasy shows coming up in the next few weeks, Universal would be wise to buy some commercial time. I can't think of better promotion than running Serenity promos during Lost.
MindPieces | September 06, 21:08 CET
SpikeBad | September 06, 21:08 CET
bonzob | September 06, 21:28 CET
So in that sense, that tagline isn't needed as most fans of Joss's shows will either already want to see it or already decided Firefly was not their cup of tea. You never know how the rest of the audience will react. Either they will have the typical reaction that Buffy and Angel were ridiculous shows with attractive people in them, and dismiss Serenity as the same, or perhaps people will remember Buffy and Angel, or at least the positive critical praise they receieved, and be enticed, even if they didn't watch them or only did so casually. Going to see a movie is different than buying a DVD boxset.
But I think the fact that it is there at all is nice, personally while I think it could have some negative impact (which is no reflection of the awesomeness that was Buffy and Angel) it should be there as a testament to Joss's work. My only other worry is that even if people aren't put off by the Buffy mention, River's whole pose may actually do that as they will think it's just Buffy in the future or something. Whilst we know how River and Buffy are two completely different individuals, they should be careful not to make them too similar in the marketing campaign.
Razor | September 06, 21:43 CET
jaynelovesvera | September 06, 22:48 CET
gossi | September 06, 23:10 CET
Lioness | September 06, 23:40 CET
Spangel | September 07, 00:37 CET
OT: Nathan watched the movie sitting 6 places away from me (though for some reason he left half an hour before the end).
[ edited by Celebithil on 2005-09-07 09:13 ]
Celebithil | September 07, 02:57 CET
Nebula1400 | September 07, 08:02 CET
SoddingNancyTribe | September 07, 08:29 CET