movies.com Buzz Bin on Serenity: "It was awesome."
Mike Standish, having now seen the movie, apparently changes his early impressions.
Serenity Now! I'm acquainted with nerds, but I'm not really one of them. At least that's what I keep telling myself. So this Joss Whedon sci-fi western sounded too nerdy, even for me. Well, I — and a theater full of soon-to-be-40-year-old virgins — saw a preview screening, and I can honestly say … it was awesome. In fact, it's inspired me to come out of the nerd closet! Where are my dice bag and Dungeon Masters Guide?
September 08 2005
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.


I know being offended by the constant "ew--nerds" flavor the press loves to trot out is part of the reason I am a nerd, but it's an old angle.
That said, nice to get the mention, even if it is sort of backhanded.
(Someone smack me if I am taking this too seriously. :))
Dizzy | September 08, 01:42 CET
The One True b!X | September 08, 01:44 CET
What can I say? I'm a bitter nerd who's having a bad day right now, so I'm cranky. ;)
Dizzy | September 08, 01:49 CET
Semi-seriously, though: I think Whedonerds are a different breed from the stereotypical sci-fi/fantasy/D&D nerd. Because of Buffy, which had a roughly even male/female mix of viewers (and because Whedon has written strong and interesting female characters in every show), Whedonerds aren't overwhelmingly male; thus, statistically speaking, there are fewer 40-year-old virgins. ;-) Buffy/Angel fans aren't limited to people who love horror/fantasy, and Firefly fans aren't limited to people who love science fiction; people who appreciate great characters and excellent writing can love them whatever the genre.
tehipite_tom | September 08, 01:51 CET
Numfar PTB | September 08, 01:56 CET
Actually, come to think of it, they're geeks, not nerds.
SoddingNancyTribe | September 08, 02:09 CET
I think that's really insulting, given how varied and intelligent the Whedon fanbase is. I for one do spend a lot of time talking about Buffy, Angel and Firefly, but I also spend a lot of time going out with my friends, participating in sport, playing an instrument and having an active social life. The average Whedonfan is probably just as likely to be a well adjusted person as the average person off the street.
Razor | September 08, 02:14 CET
ringworm | September 08, 02:18 CET
newcj | September 08, 02:28 CET
Certainly among the senior echelons of the then online massive Buffyverse fandom, there seemed to be a lot more female fans than male fans.
Simon | September 08, 02:31 CET
Nebula1400 | September 08, 02:44 CET
Paul_Rocks | September 08, 02:51 CET
Always lurking, and yes, sir, we are geeks! :) I will have to ask you to add the 'n' to her username, however. Them's fightin' words! ;) And since you called us out -- GEEK LOVE RULES! Happy now? :D
zeitgeist | September 08, 02:59 CET
Only watch this trailer if you've fantasized about being in a threesome with Kevin Bacon and Colin Firth.
Um... hasn't EVERYONE fantasized about that? *ducks & runs*
[ edited by flashofgenius on 2005-09-08 01:14 ]
flashofgenius | September 08, 03:14 CET
futile | September 08, 03:18 CET
The point being: He earlier thought this was going to be a nerd movie. Then he saw it and loved it. But he doesn't consider himself a nerd. Therefore it's not a movie just for nerds.
But he had some playful fun with the alternative implication: That liking the movie meant he WAS a nerd, so he played with throwing himself into the stereotype.
The One True b!X | September 08, 03:18 CET
MissKittysMom | September 08, 03:44 CET
Re: the Serenity review. Honestly, I thought it was all sweetness and reverence from someone outside the 'verse who realized he may have had it wrong. But maybe I'm an apologist because I can relate: said as much myself, if not worse, when I first started lurking here, and then when zeitgeist first invited me to wing out to Chicago for a screening. "What? Me? Wait on line? For a movie? A sci-fi movie, no less? I don't fit in here. That's not me. I don't know anything about TV shows or comics or graphic novels. I've never engaged in 'gaming' and am not even sure what that means. Last time I considered myself a 'fan' of anything, I was carrying a sunset-themed Trapper Keeper and there was a Ponyboy Curtis centerfold taped to my closet doors. That's just not me, so all this associated stuff just can't be for me."
Luckily, I stumbled upon just how wrong I was in time to reap the giant rewards. Being welcomed into this community of smart, funny, and articulate like-minded souls. Finding Serenity. Plus, that thing I found here that SNT refers to as 'Geek Love?' (I have some other, more descriptive names for this thing me and z have going on, but I'm thinking they're probably way too much information for y'all. ;D ) It's a helluva thing.
[ edited by barest_smidgen on 2005-09-08 02:48 ]
[ edited by barest_smidgen on 2005-09-08 02:55 ]
barest_smidgen | September 08, 04:26 CET
[ edited by zeitgeist on 2005-09-08 02:54 ]
zeitgeist | September 08, 04:51 CET
Uh, I mean... Dangit.
kishi | September 08, 05:27 CET
What's an RPG?
Nebula1400 | September 08, 06:07 CET
See also: Wikipedia entry
[ edited by zeitgeist on 2005-09-08 05:27 ]
zeitgeist | September 08, 07:18 CET
Nebula1400 | September 08, 08:00 CET
Well, joking or not, I'm sensing a disturbing divide-and-conquer anti-"sci-fi/fantasy/D&D nerd" trend here. They're our brothers-in-arms! We don't need to diss people who are able to use their imaginations to play games, rather than push buttons or move pieces around a board, in order to feel better about our own fandom. Has watching BtVS taught us nothing? Honestly . . . I was a proud D&D player, reader of fantasy, watcher of bad sci-fi flicks, and also, just as with Razor above, a social guy, a football and cricket player, a band member, and had the occasional girlfriend too. (Well, that last bit's a lie, I'm actually an approaching-40 virgin, but don't tell anyone).
I think theonetruebix nailed the intent here. No offense need be taken.
SoddingNancyTribe | September 08, 09:03 CET
jaynelovesvera | September 08, 11:55 CET
Yeah, I think so. But years of being a nerd has made me jumpy. I used to have a sense of humor, I really did. :)
Dizzy | September 08, 16:41 CET
jabby | September 08, 17:20 CET
RPG stands for Report Program Generator, an ancient programming language that was made obsolete by the development of databases. As programming languages go, RPG ranks below Perl and only slightly ahead of APL in terms of (non-)readability to humans.
The fact that Iraqi insurgents are still using RPG to plan their attacks is a strong indicator of just how backward their culture has become.
MissKittysMom | September 08, 18:10 CET
MissKittysMom | September 08, 18:14 CET
MissKittysMom, you made your point. We lesser nerds must bow before you.
And btw futile: I like your observations about Andrews becoming Gileses.
TactGuy | September 08, 18:44 CET
But I am only a nerd of the absurd and forgotten programming languages. No one bows before me with offerings; they only come to laugh and point.
Woe is the life of the nerds who guard the cesspools of useless knowledge.
MissKittysMom | September 08, 19:34 CET
I hope I didn't imply that, because I think the sci/fi/fantasy/D&D nerds are the most intriguing and generally decent people alive. I just don't like stereotypes, because they are so often used to belittle people (who might secretly be saving the world with their super powers, or maybe just somebody's mom).
Nebula1400 | September 08, 20:02 CET
Madhatter | September 08, 20:07 CET
I'm not ashamed of being geeky about something I love, I just thought that particular comment was very harsh. There's a difference between being a geek and being a completely socially challenged wacko. I do think characters like Willow have really been good for our image. I remember watching a documentary on the Buffy season 6 DVD where Joss says Alyson was one of the, if not the only, actress up for the part of Willow who didn't wear glasses and act really unbelievably. That's what cool about the character, because she has so many good qualities that most of her peers failed to notice.
Trust me, people who debate the works of Shakespeare are not considered "normal" by the vast majority of Americans. The sports comment works though. ;-)
I get your point, because most people wouldn't, but a lot of academic people do. They would tend to look down at someone doing the same to Star Wars or Buffy. And the fact is, I don't think virginity is something to be sneered at. I certainly don't intend to be a 40 year old virgin by any stretch of the imagination, but I respect people who might not want to grab hold of the soonest action coming their way.
Personally, in my own experience, Buffy seems to be seen a a girly programme. The extreme of the attractiveness of the cast isn't a good enough reason for males to watch it, and just because the lead character is female they in fact shouldn't, at least in most people's opinions.
Online it is a completely different situation, because I think there is a good mixture of ages and genders. People can identify with the characters, appreciate the story and intelligent writing, and enjoy the action or horror or humour, regardless of who they are.
I was a proud D&D player, reader of fantasy, watcher of bad sci-fi flicks, and also, just as with Razor above, a social guy.
I feel really stupid, I hadn't realised SNT was a guy. I think the "Nancy" part in the name confused me.
But I really enjoy being able to talk about Joss's work with everyone here, and I have a number of really sociable, funny, likeable friends in the offline world who enjoy talking about movies and TV shows and music to the same extent we do here. And I heard some guys talk about a football match for about an hour today, the same match the whole time, yet that is viewed as normal, when talking about a film isn't, by the average person at least. What a world we live in.
[ edited by Razor on 2005-09-08 22:34 ]
Razor | September 08, 21:20 CET
electricspacegirl | September 08, 21:21 CET
Harpy | September 08, 22:04 CET
riaspark17 | September 09, 02:49 CET