September 25 2005
(SPOILER)
David Fury talks about the network interference on 'Lost'.
"As the show became a success the network was even more protective of the notion that we don't want to alienate anyone". Contains spoilers for season two.
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.


Heh... it's kind of weird loving a show and not worrying about it being cancelled any time soon.
TheZeppo | September 25, 14:35 CET
It's funny, I was talking about the same thing the other day. Lost is a quality scripted serialized genre show with a focus on characters and it is a huge ratings success!
I am able to sit back and enjoy the slowly unraveling mysteries and never fear that the show will cut off before we have all the answers. But besides enjoying this show very much, I am hoping that it opens execs eyes to the fact that shows like this can, in fact, be successful. Perhaps we will start to see a positive trend on tv, for once, with more genre shows and less 'reality'.
Oh, I also wish Fury would come back to Lost. I don't watch 24 anyway.
AnotherFireflyfan | September 25, 15:44 CET
Madhatter | September 25, 16:36 CET
The network needs to take a chill pill. The biggest complaint about LOST is that fans are looking for answers, whether supernatural or not. It seems to me that a supernatural/religious element intrigues more than puts people off.
spikeylover | September 25, 16:41 CET
Madhatter | September 25, 16:49 CET
Madhatter, you can get to it at the bottom of the images by pressing the blue text. You will then be directed to the photopool, then you gotta click on the "Whedonesque: The Library" text.
As I'm from the UK, I believe I've only seen one David Fury episode, but it really has been one of the best so far. I've never watched '24' before but if Season 5 comes to terrestrial I may give it a chance.
Apocalypse | September 25, 17:01 CET
I can dream.
gossi | September 25, 18:21 CET
David Fury running his own show? That's a dream with which I can get on board!
Jon | September 25, 18:39 CET
8 seasons of Lost? Heh. That's some mission, especially to explain in any kind of logic way. I got bored after the first 12 episodes or so.
gossi | September 25, 18:46 CET
I don't watch "24", so please David, come back to "Lost"!
My favourite show right now on tv.
And those 8 seasons rumors are false.
They say they know when and how to stop, and that they're thinking in 4 or 5 seasons.
Angel TheVampire | September 25, 19:48 CET
Ask fans for their 5 favorite episodes, and I'd bet that at least 3 of those would be on their list.
ABC, I really doubt that the supernatural stuff bothers people. In fact, no matter how popular Survivor may be, that's part of what makes Lost so compelling.
rabid | September 25, 19:53 CET
MindPieces | September 25, 20:02 CET
And good on him. If I had a family and somebody offered me a shit load of money for a few years work, I'd do it, especially if it raised my profile.
[ edited by gossi on 2005-09-25 18:12 ]
gossi | September 25, 20:11 CET
Fury's episodes are all very good though. I think Special is highly underrated, and Walkabout and Numbers are rightfully popular.
rabid | September 25, 20:29 CET
eddy | September 25, 23:30 CET
BAFfler | September 25, 23:43 CET
eddy | September 26, 00:00 CET
sari | September 26, 00:15 CET
David Fury said:
“The network and the studio hate the supernatural elements of the show...They won't admit to that but that's the thing that scared them the most and what they thought would alienate the audience the most."
That's really not reassuring to hear. I hope the network stays out of it, 'cause they could really fuck things up.
"They don't understand that that's what's intriguing to people."
At the same time, Fury shouldn't generalize like that. A lot of times last season, I was way more intrigued by the characters themselves and their backstories (even the non-supernatural/coincidental elements) than whatever mysteries were involved in the show. A few times last year I thought that I could easily watch a show about these folks involved regular life challenges. A testament to the strength of the writing and acting. At other times during Season 1 though, I was good for character background/flashbacks and was just thinking, "Plot! Where's the forward movement? Plot!" I think I like the whole package overall though.
"According to Fury, the network mandated rational explanations for every potential fantasy element of the show as a fallback position."
While the network shouldn't be mandating anything, that's not a half-bad idea. I just don't want every seemingly inexplicable mystery of the series revealed to be a supernatural/religious thing. I'm afraid that JJ Abrams and company are just gonna Deus Ex Machina the whole thing to death in the worst kind of hackneyed way...Maybe not this season, but eventually. It would be so easy...
Lindelof said:
"24 is serialized but every season they reset."
That's not true. The plots reset more or less, sure (though cliffhangers like Season 2's flow into subsequent seasons). But the character development (heh, character trauma is more like it) builds and builds for as long as characters continue to survive and show up each season. Without going into spoilers because I hope more people give 24 a shot on DVD some day, there is a specific character that's done something unforgivable to Kiefer Sutherland's character in Season 1 and when that character shows up again in Season 2, it's a continuation of Season 1. And Jack Bauer's hate is completely believable and alive.
People can bitch about 24's clock gimmick and often overblown action-terrorist storylines, but I personally don't think it's lacking one bit in the areas of acting, strong characters, and dialogue. It's a pretty serious show, sure. The humor only exists where it can be reasonably fit, and it's often very grim, but I like that they aren't trying to crack a joke every dozen lines. Pop culture references en masse wouldn't fit.
Kris | September 26, 09:27 CET
Playing it safe may gain the network higher numbers for a time -- by explaining away the mystery with logic and making it accessible to even the least-invested viewer -- but if they care at all about crafting a quality series that will gain them respect from their peers, earn a stable of devoted fans and stand the test of time, the execs will stick to their paperwork and leave the creatives alone. Otherwise, viewers looking for substance will desert it for something that doesn't belittle their intelligence, and it'll become just another in a painfully long string of TV disappointments.
There's a million reality/cop/lawyer/doctor/etc. programs out there that aren't genre-friendly -- that don't go out of their way to challenge people's imaginations, whether that means attempting to advance the TV medium itself, or simply daring to step outside their formulas once in a while. Surely there's room for a few exceptions to keep the rest of us happy?
Wiseblood | September 26, 10:04 CET
But I'm very pleased Lost is doing well, it'll be good for the genre, shows it's not fallen away, and it'll help get rid of reality tv craze which I think is starting to seem more distant.
[ edited by SeanValen on 2005-09-26 08:37 ]
SeanValen | September 26, 10:35 CET