"Dont freak. Dont react. Take control. Just step up."
October 05
2005
Scary Whedon Fans?
SF Chronicle critic who gave Serenity a rating of 100 is confused by the backlash...from Whedon fans.
Samantha
| Fandom&Fun
| 04:19 CET
|
55 comments total
| tags:
You need to
log in to be able to post comments.
About
membership.
« Older
Where does box office money actual...
|
Adam Baldwin's 25-year acting care...
Newer »
© 2002 - 2009 - WHEDONesque.com
(
e-mail)
Individual posts are copyright their respective authors
This is a non-profit, unofficial website, not affiliated with Mutant Enemy, Inc., 20th Century Fox, Warner Brothers or UPN.
That's downright embarrassing.
[ edited by Tiny Tabby on 2005-10-05 02:52 ]
Tiny Tabby | October 05, 04:30 CET
[ edited by jam2 on 2005-10-05 02:33 ]
jam2 | October 05, 04:32 CET
Craig Oxbrow | October 05, 04:35 CET
MySerenity | October 05, 04:35 CET
[ edited by eddy on 2005-10-05 02:38 ]
eddy | October 05, 04:37 CET
Maybe when the idiot extremist fans among us stop alienating reviewers who are actually our ALLIES?
The One True b!X | October 05, 04:38 CET
IMForeman | October 05, 04:39 CET
orphea | October 05, 04:39 CET
Paul_Rocks | October 05, 04:42 CET
I hoped this wouldn't happen but when Universal & Whedon enlisted the fans for publicity in such a major way, I was a little worried it might get out of hand like this. Fandom, like everything else, you gotta take the good with the bad.
[ edited by Unitas on 2005-10-05 02:46 ]
Unitas | October 05, 04:44 CET
Samantha | October 05, 04:44 CET
SDWolfpup | October 05, 04:46 CET
Oddjob | October 05, 04:51 CET
But I hope his article doesn't turn away people from going to see the movie.
Firefly Flanatic | October 05, 04:52 CET
I saw a lot worse from Farscape fans between the shows cancellation and the Peacekeeper wars announcement, especially aimed towards fans of the Stargates (I admit to being a pretty big (but not uber big) sci-fi fan.) It just happens... While it may affect the decision of certain fans to give Firefly/Serenity a try, I doubt it has a major effect either way.
rabid | October 05, 04:58 CET
RavenU | October 05, 04:59 CET
These are the people that I avoid like the plague at any function that I've been to. These weird unwashed that have no life other than whatever show they've "adopted".
I can't stand these type folk. They embarrass us and make us all look like hypnotized freaks. They're loud, crass, and smelly. They're the ones that ask all those inappropriate questions of Joss and the actors at conventions. They make me long for another show to come along that they can latch onto, and leave us saner people alone.
Sorry if this offends any of you (uh, no, really not)... but even sorrier if my description fits you. Grow some couth, some decorum, then bring your gifts to the fandom.
Fleagh.
Willowy | October 05, 05:00 CET
[ edited by Alanna_Wolff on 2005-10-05 03:05 ]
Alanna_Wolff | October 05, 05:04 CET
I was really dismayed to read that you've been getting "hate mail" from Serenity fan-atics. As a Serenity fan (a.k.a., Browncoat), I want to publicly denounce this fortunately very small (but unfortunately very vocal) percentage of the Serenity/Firefly fans.
Sadly, these fanatics are missing one of the key points of the movie -- that any government (or organization or individual) that tries to impose a certain way of thinking as the *only* way of thinking is something that should be fought against. That is exactly what the crew of Serenity did in the movie.
It bothers me that a few "uber-fans" could paint all Firefly/Serenity fans as zealots who are more extreme than even Michael Savage lovers/haters (is that even possible?). Please believe me when I say that the vast majority of "Browncoats" are normal, relatively well adjusted folks who happen to enjoy a TV series and movie that Joss Whedon created. We're not rabid or angry, and we "get" that, in the grand scheme of things, Serenity is just a movie (albeit a brilliant, thoroughly engaging and entertaining one) whose importance pales in comparison to natural disasters, abject poverty, political and religious oppression, and other concerns that are way more deserving of our time, money, and passion than whether a movie critic's review is glowing enough.
danncer | October 05, 05:11 CET
I know what you mean....Just because someone is a fan of Joss' work too does not mean I'll always automatically like them. I've been defending the Browncoats from the flack their getting lately from the other fandoms, but this is the kind of crap that started that bad rap to begin with, and it's indefensible.
I still say it's not representative fo the majority, but as with all extremists, they unfortunately get noticed the most. Frikkin' embarrassing....I'm gonna drop this writer a note too. Just to let him know these basket cases do not represent us.
EdDantes | October 05, 05:16 CET
Aurra | October 05, 05:30 CET
Was this journo wrong? No. He wrote a flippin' excellent review. However, even if he had HATED it, he's perfected entitled to think bad of it.
That's one of the core messages in the film. It's very hard to see fans not understanding this sort of thing.
It's not a big problem... but it is getting worse as it goes on.
I don't like football (soccer). I think it's stupid, and pointless. But would I hurl abuse at soccer fans? No. It's their thing, they understand it, I don't. I have the right to think it's stupid. And anybody knocking that right from afar...
gossi | October 05, 05:32 CET
Mr Universe | October 05, 05:34 CET
IMMORTAL | October 05, 06:06 CET
embers | October 05, 06:28 CET
"Harry here... I temporarily shut down Talk Back registration while this whole Brown Coat nonsense blows over".
[ edited by RavenU on 2005-10-05 04:30 ]
RavenU | October 05, 06:29 CET
palehorse | October 05, 06:34 CET
did people read the ridiculous comments the person sent!
[ edited by SoddingNancyTribe on 2005-10-05 06:52 ]
tullyano7 | October 05, 06:55 CET
I admit: I have never been deeply involved in any fandom as much as I have this one, but I have floated on the fringes of some pretty big ones. I worked in comics/manga and anime for about 2 years, and our company owner was friends with most of the big names in anime and manga. So I have seen bad fan behavior. I've seen the inappropriate questions, smelled the B.O., seen the desperation of people who only had this one thing to hold onto in life. I imagine some of these same people would write hate letters to publishers of manga that "flipped" the pages [since the Japanese read things back-to-front, it used to be a practice for Western publishers to flip the pages to the way we Westerners read them] And oy! The debates about dub vs. sub! I am sure fistfights have occurred over that one.
My point is, bad fan behavior wasn't invented by these so-called Browncoats. In fact it is pretty typical of any fanbase to have these nuts voicing their delusional feelings.
I guess what I'm saying is that I am disappointed that those who make their living dealing with fans and fandoms are confusing the psychos with the sane folks, and letting the crazies paint the whole fandom.
[ edited by dizzy on 2005-10-05 07:12 ]
Dizzy | October 05, 07:12 CET
At this point, i'm more worried about them than this guy, who at least understands fandom to an extent. Sending hate mail to any reviewer, even the ones you passionately disagree with, isn't OK in my book, and if a few browncoats are doing that it reflects badly on everyone.
acp | October 05, 07:17 CET
I wonder if it really is Browncoats, not that I doubt that we have our share of loonies because we do, but I'm also aware of an anti-Joss contingent and it wouldn't surprise me if they were behind some of this too.
At any rate, its all very silly and quite embarrassing. To quote Buffy: "What are you, twelve?"
killinj | October 05, 07:20 CET
I am getting damn sick of a small handful of crazies making all of us look bad, and the sci-fi community buying into Browncoats as zealots and freaks. I mean, did anyone write any articles about how much money the SF Browncoats raised for charity a couple of months back? A dedicated group of people did something amazing, yet a couple of wacks email a reviewer, and that's the press we get. At a time when good press is vital to the success or failure of the movie, this is what is being written about.
[And in case I haven't made myself clear, I find it completely despicable that someone would send hate mail to anyone, for any reason. The behavior is disgusting, and I understand the reporter's reaction. But once again, I am frustrated that he cannot see this is a small part of our fandom. And I'm not placing any blame on him, because that rests with the bad fans... just disappointed his reaction seems to be condemnation of the entire fandom.]
Dizzy | October 05, 08:00 CET
ChosenOne5376 | October 05, 08:22 CET
SoddingNancyTribe | October 05, 08:56 CET
Dizzy | October 05, 09:11 CET
In society, genre fandoms are usually looked down upon and ridiculed many ways. Now the other genre fandoms are starting to look down on us thanks to the zealots. It's downright depressing. I don't feel responsible for what a minority of headcases do and say, but it still reflects on us. We're approaching a time where just saying you like Joss Whedon's work will get you a look.
(Yes even online you can get looks....)
I wrote the writer of the article a short note much like Flanatic. And it's not to apologise, it's just to let him know we're not all insane...
EdDantes | October 05, 09:20 CET
Heh, maybe if enough people mail him we can outnumber those few that caused problems.
Caleb | October 05, 09:44 CET
[ edited by dizzy on 2005-10-05 07:49 ]
Dizzy | October 05, 09:47 CET
Yeah there are indeed people who go out of their way to point out how much they hate Joss. I can never get in that mindset. I hate Charmed for example, but why on earth would I go to a Charmed board or thread just to tell people that?? I don't watch it and I don't look it up on the net. Very simple.
Man, things are just bumming me out here....
Yeah that's what I was thinking. Gotta balance the scales a tad.
EdDantes | October 05, 09:52 CET
Simon | October 05, 10:26 CET
There are always strangelings in every group. Also for the most part, the net can be fairly anonimous and easy to spit venom in any direction.
I just wish I had written to you as one of those who enjoyed your review.
luvs nix
nixygirl | October 05, 11:33 CET
Seriously - the little guy falling out of his chair in the pink section (is it still pink?) made me jump out of my own chair. He says it all. Thanks so much for that great review.
After I wrote it, I realized I had compared the 'rogue geeks' to reavers. Oh well...
I like the caption under the picture - "best movie ever" - even if he is being sarcastic.
Revello | October 05, 13:50 CET
GVH | October 05, 15:04 CET
Potter fan 'threatens to kill'
Hanover - The stress of standing in line to buy the German edition of Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince proved too much for a man in Germany, who ran amok and threatened to kill people unless he got a book, police said on Tuesday.
The unnamed 24-year-old man stormed into a book shop in the Hanover railway station and absconded with six copies of the German-language edition, which went on sale nationwide on Saturday.
Finding it hard to carry the books while running, he dashed into another shop on the railway concourse and pushed shoppers aside to demand a shopping bag from a sales clerk. He punched a customer in the face when admonished for being rude.
With police in hot pursuit, the Potter fan raced across a crowded train platform, threatening to kill anyone who got in his way. Officers finally tackled the man, who was unarmed aside from the six 900-page books.
"Suspect said he could not stand the suspense of not knowing who the half-blood prince was," a Hanover police spokesperson said.
"Suspect was informed that he will likely have plenty of time for reading long books in his jail cell."
miranda | October 05, 15:24 CET
I wonder if the Whedon haters found a new sport, pretending to be Browncoats and sending nasty letters and obnoxious posts. Taking that one step further, once someone comes up with a "cause" there will always be foolish people who will go along without realizing they are hurting the very thing they are trying to help.
Just a thought.
newcj | October 05, 15:58 CET
Reminds me of some JM 'fans' who seemed to have a lot of time on their hands to do nothing but be nasty at JM and his fans, while claiming they themselves were also fans. I actually hope it's the same ones, then I know it's only a few and not a separate faction.
I think it's nice so many of you sent letters of apology on behalf of this type of behavior. It certainly must have made an impression that there was an entire piece on it, hopefully the apologies make MORE of an impression!
[ edited by Grace on 2005-10-05 14:18 ]
Grace | October 05, 16:17 CET
mnspnr | October 05, 16:24 CET
Simon | October 05, 16:29 CET
There are Whedon-haters and trolls out there, but I have no doubt that the people sending in such emails call themselves "Browncoats." The alternative - a conspiracy by Whedon-haters - is a little too paranoid-conspiracy for me. What a shame. I'm in favor of level-headed emailed apologies to the Chronicle reviewer.
phlebotinin | October 05, 17:01 CET
Interestingly enough the preview audience I went see Serenity with in June was particularly low key. Although some folks tryed to get some singing going they were swimming up stream and let it be after getting folks to sing Happy Birthday to Joss. Most people were pretty clear they were not into fannish displays though no one seemed hostile about it. Generally they were a polite, excited and enthusiastic yet rather laid-back group...and that is pretty unusual for New Jersey. ;-) This whole thing came out of left field for me.
newcj | October 05, 17:56 CET
Amen, dizzy! I realize how annoying these xi niu idiots can make people feel. But giving them attention just brings their bad behavior front and center. Why can't people just learn to ignore the trash talkers? Sure, it's wrong to badger a reviewer like this...but the reviewer is simply passing along the sin by making a sotry of it for all to see.
Harlan Ellison once wrote an essay that listed the horrible acts done to authors by so-called 'fans'. In it, he says, (and I paraphrase) "This excludes all the good guys". I submit that by focusing on the negative, you *are* excluding the good guys. The best way to handle terrible behavior like this is to ignore it, if you ask me.
Mick The Knife | October 05, 19:00 CET
I can't believe the "fame" we're getting, just for a few fans.
We all are not like them.
I'm agree, we should do anything. They need to see that Whedon fans are educated and respectful.
Internet is full of people insulting everyone and everything, but they aren't representative of an entire community.
[ edited by Angel TheVampire on 2005-10-05 21:55 ]
Angel TheVampire | October 05, 23:51 CET
Not surprisingly, I haven't heard back.
Moral of the story is: Don't be a jackass. And if you can't help yourself, don't be a jackass to someone in the media or one of the BDH's.
Okay, someone help this old man down off his soap box...
Thanks,
Rhett
Mr. Bosslady | October 06, 01:11 CET
Looks like all those apologetic emails found their way to him :-)
acp | October 06, 01:29 CET
Now that's something I'm proud of :D
Angel TheVampire | October 06, 02:15 CET