October 16
2005
The Title of Sarah Michelle Gellar's new movie revealed.
Film website imdb.com reports that the project formerly known as "Revolver" has now been named as "The Return".
Apocalypse
| Cast&Crew
| 14:59 CET
|
7 comments total
| tags: sarah michelle gellar
You need to
log in to be able to post comments.
About
membership.
« Older
(SPOILER)
Failure of Utopia - Analysis of Se...
|
Serenity's third US Box Office wee...
Newer »
© 2002 - 2009 - WHEDONesque.com
(
e-mail)
Individual posts are copyright their respective authors
This is a non-profit, unofficial website, not affiliated with Mutant Enemy, Inc., 20th Century Fox, Warner Brothers or UPN.
garda39 | October 16, 17:06 CET
Cranberry | October 16, 18:22 CET
Cranberry: The problem with "Revolver" is that there is a Guy Ritchie movie with the exact same title. That film has just been released in the UK a few weeks ago for example, so that title definitely wouldn't work there. As for other countries, he may already have dibs on the title.
Once you know a bit about the story, the title "The Return" does make sense. But since the information comes from imdb, I wouldn't be at all surprised if it ends up being called something completely different. I actually don't think the title of "Revolver" is a good one in the case of this film anyway. It makes people think of guns and gangsters which is certainly not what the film is about. In the case of Guy Ritchie, that's exactly what you're supposed to think of, so it works.
Impossible | October 16, 18:29 CET
In any case, IMDB isn't the greatest source but some of the people that post on their boards do post correct info occassionally. It's best to wait for an official release to show up on reliable sites.
Silent Night | October 16, 18:54 CET
leaveittoreaver | October 16, 19:02 CET
Occasionaly news is posted first in the forums but for it to be accurate it usually has to be posted by the Hostess.
[ edited by garda39 on 2005-10-16 18:54 ]
garda39 | October 16, 20:32 CET
I think The Return sounds okay, it's better than actually mentioning what the return is of, which tends to be a little more forgettable.
Razor | October 16, 22:54 CET