Third Week of Box Office Takings in Australia.
UIP posted this earlier at Serenity Oz.
We are of course still awaiting the much promised second wave of screenings and what kind of money they will produce for the BDM.
October 24 2005
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.


Waiting for what???
crossoverman | October 24, 10:51 CET
Djungelurban | October 24, 11:51 CET
nixygirl | October 24, 11:54 CET
Not so much, Djungelurban.. I think you've missed the news over the weekend that UIP are dropping the movie in some other countries.
[ edited by gossi on 2005-10-24 10:33 ]
gossi | October 24, 12:31 CET
purplehazel | October 24, 13:07 CET
Djungelurban | October 24, 13:35 CET
gossi | October 24, 13:41 CET
Also ask and you shall recieve. Notice how quickly UIP put up the second wave screening? Looks like they're still lurking!
I don't care what anyone says UIP in Oz have been absolutely fantastic and worked their behinds off for us fans. I love them for that!
nixygirl | October 24, 14:02 CET
I've been doing a lot of thinking about Serenity lately, and one thing is for sure: in all these countries it opens, the same thing happens; it drops about 50% the 2nd week, and keeps dropping.
You can blame the marketing all you like (I don't think the trailers were great), but the fact is the movie just doesn't do that great with the general public. Certainly, there is some word of mouth (the midweek UK figures were impressive) but not enough unfortunately.
UIP UK and Oz were both fantastic with the fans I think (I mean, beers with Joss, hello?). It was by no means a standard film launch here or in Australia, I'm not sure it'll ever be repeated, and it was great experiencing that.
ETA: For anybody interested, the UK dropped from 355 to 200 screens this weekend, and finished 11th. Spin wise, it did well per screen compared to the competition... But the screen droppings for family friendly films in the UK will kill this off.
[ edited by gossi on 2005-10-24 12:32 ]
gossi | October 24, 14:28 CET
nixygirl | October 24, 14:41 CET
GVH | October 24, 15:17 CET
One of the many things I noticed that I have not said before is that the TV ads blended into the background. The only reason I noticed them was because I would suddenly realize one of the BDH was on the screen. That was what caught my attention. If that was all that caught my attention, what was there to catch the attention of the general public who have no idea who these characters/actors are?
After that I started noticing how other movie ads made my mind tune in. There was something different about them that made them stand out from the other commercials. Serenity ads did not do that.
The other thing was that they did not advertise to the general public. They advertised to a very specific group. IMHO the general public quite honestly is not going to go to a movie based on the opinion of that group unless it has reinforcement some other way. Ads using mainstream reviewer's comments after it opened might have helped, but there was no advertising from what I saw after it opened .
Oh, and I never did see a poster in real life...at all. Even in the two theaters I saw the BDM in. (sigh)
newcj | October 24, 15:20 CET
The movie had 0 movie posters in bus stations here, or on the streets - the only posters were on the tube in London. Very few TV adverts at all (nothing like the US adverts). And it opened #1.
The advertising was certainly confused across the board, but the movie was also confused. A great movie, but a marketing persons nightmare.
[ edited by gossi on 2005-10-24 13:56 ]
gossi | October 24, 15:54 CET
Now I feel like they were unfocused and never had any plan to try to get the mainstream into the theaters. It reminded me of when I play a game like tetrus (Yes, I'm old. I've admitted that already.)If I make a decision and then suddenly realize that there was a better one and I try to switch, then realize it is too late and try to switch back, I end up with neither good choice and usually something really bad.
I have no idea what happened with the marketing, other than it did not catch anyone's attention, there was no follow-up and it seemed to be aimed at people who were already going to go see it. I am sure various people did what they thought best for the movie, but in a lot of cases it reflected a very narrow view of its appeal.
I also realize the possibilities for the marketing were limited because of everything already mentioned. I'm not sure whether they realized the range of demographics that would like the movie, or wether they simply did not care. Maybe they were actually trying to leave room for people outside the males 15 to 40 (or whatever) and that is why the ads were so...uninspired. I don't know. What I do know is that everytime something came out and I watched it or saw it, my heart sank because IMO it did not capture the movie.
newcj | October 24, 20:17 CET
bobster | October 24, 20:33 CET
Go here to read Tiredoldreaver's primer
Drifter | October 24, 22:28 CET
So that should rustle up, what, a few hundred bucks?
crossoverman | October 25, 11:09 CET