November 10 2005
Alyson helps co-star to stop smoking.
Jason Segel talks about having to quit smoking because Alyson refused to kiss him or do any romantic scenes with him, because he smelled like smoke. He thanks her for forcing him to do that because now he not only smells better, he feels better as well.
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.


Succatash | November 10, 20:46 CET
[ edited by Firefly Flanatic on 2005-11-10 18:54 ]
Firefly Flanatic | November 10, 20:54 CET
WhedonTrivia | November 10, 20:59 CET
On a serious note, if someone smells because of smoke or anything else, why shouldn't someone say something? Especially if you have to work closely together. I don't see any problem with her letting him know.
two_guns | November 10, 21:00 CET
So no... I don't think that Alyson was being high-maintenance, she has to be with the guy on-screen, closely, a fair amount of time. If he was smoking between shots, than she would have to deal with it for the show's entire run. If she said to the director (I refuse to film the scene) it might be a problem, but I can understand bending the screenplay directions if it really bothers her, and it's good to know that he quit because of it.
rabid | November 10, 21:00 CET
Simon | November 10, 21:01 CET
I don’t smoke and I am very sensitive to the smoke and the smell so I can’t blame Alyson for not wanting to deal with it. There’s no getting around the fact that it stinks (unless you smoke a pipe) and it bothers me to see cigarette butts littering the ground. I also have (or had) too many relatives with health issues related to smoking to ever find it appealing. If someone likes to smoke, that’s fine with me as long as they aren’t imposing on my right to breathe fresh air instead of their secondhand smoke.
bloodflowers | November 10, 21:36 CET
Oh, and Simon brings the snark :) Fantastic!
zeitgeist | November 10, 21:39 CET
SoddingNancyTribe | November 10, 21:49 CET
blutortu | November 10, 21:57 CET
Succatash | November 10, 21:58 CET
pat32082 | November 10, 21:59 CET
Either way, it was way way out of line. Let's try to exhibit some good judgment, yes?
SoddingNancyTribe | November 10, 22:02 CET
BTW, wasn't there some kind of pranky one-upsmanship between SMG and DB about making their breath foul before kissing scenes??
Rogue Slayer | November 10, 22:09 CET
Succatash | November 10, 22:21 CET
two_guns | November 10, 22:24 CET
[ edited by Impossible on 2005-11-10 20:26 ]
Impossible | November 10, 22:25 CET
Djungelurban | November 10, 22:31 CET
Succatash | November 10, 22:31 CET
Chris inVirginia | November 10, 22:39 CET
RavenU | November 10, 22:40 CET
[ edited by two_guns on 2005-11-10 20:43 ]
two_guns | November 10, 22:40 CET
The Social Security Administration has said that obesity "is a complex, chronic disease characterized by excessive accumulation of body fat. Obesity is generally the result of a combination of factors (e.g. genetic, environmental, and behavioral)." 65 Fed. Reg. 31039. In other words, being overweight is not "a bad habit." Since it is not necessarily within people's control (unlike, it could be argued, smoking), moral judgments about overweight people are completely beside the point and, as mine and other's reactions might demonstrate, can be as offensive as comments about ethnicity, gender, or sexual orientation.
And now, let's return to the subject at hand - kissing Alyson Hannigan, I think it was.
SoddingNancyTribe | November 10, 22:42 CET
Chris inVirginia | November 10, 22:46 CET
Succatash | November 10, 22:50 CET
Danica | November 10, 22:51 CET
SoddingNancyTribe | November 10, 22:56 CET
Allyson | November 10, 22:57 CET
Impressionable kids: smoking is bad for you. Just in case you hadn't heard.
SoddingNancyTribe | November 10, 23:04 CET
I'm thinking Spike and Faith in the basement....
Rogue Slayer | November 10, 23:14 CET
As the above reference to my history with smoky men indicates, IMO someone can definately be stinky and cute. That said, it sure was a relief, on many levels, when 11 years ago the guy I loved told me he had quit. That made him cute squared + healthier and kept me from having to deal with the smell of smoke in my clothes. In other words I got to stop being stinky too!
newcj | November 10, 23:32 CET
GrrrAargh | November 10, 23:33 CET
Hjermsted | November 10, 23:44 CET
Simon | November 10, 23:47 CET
runs from Simon's wife
I've tried to quit a few times. It's...hard.
Allyson | November 10, 23:50 CET
m'cookies actual | November 11, 00:19 CET
zeitgeist | November 11, 00:23 CET
rua1412 | November 11, 00:25 CET
m'cookies actual | November 11, 00:47 CET
debw | November 11, 01:06 CET
I appreciate the visual sex appeal of cigarettes -- I've had fantasies about Angel/Angelus's nasty little habit that I *cough* won't go into here. However, in RL I'm often debilitated by migraines when I'm exposed to cigarettes for any length of time. Kind of puts a damper on the sexiness.
Smokers can choose to inhale/exhale tobacco smoke (and 599 additional additive ingredients), which is OK so long as they remember non-smokers prefer (or in some cases, need) their oxygen unadulterated.
Wiseblood | November 11, 01:22 CET
http://www.news.com.au/story/0,10117,16801771-23109,00.html
Note to Allyson Hannigan: I don't smoke!
fruit punch mouth | November 11, 01:29 CET
Really it was....and I didn't even jones/crave/shake. I have a good friend that's a doctor and he got me on a program with Zyban and the Nicotine patch. I did both at the same time. Total Rush!!! Kind of like when Willow was at Rack's on the ceiling freaking out on some "bad" magic (flying through the stars and seeing funky stuff). About 4 weeks later when it was time to step down to the lower level of Nicotine patch, I was ready to never have another cig again.
And not to bring back the whole discussion about smoking and over weight people (I don't want to be banned either!) but....I was thinking that it would have been a more accurate analogy to say....
"I was in a play once, and I had to kiss a girl who was always drunk. I refused to kiss her until she got sober (and brushed her teeth). I used to be an alcoholic and now when I am around drunk people I feel physically ill."
alexreager | November 11, 02:22 CET
fortunateizzi | November 11, 02:24 CET
I loved the damn things, all 50 or 60 I'd smoke each day, and it just got to the point where it really irritated me that I had to make sure they were always there.
Chris inVirginia | November 11, 03:28 CET
I agree with Chris in Virginia, people quit when they want to or when they are ready. I used to smoke but eventually I got it down to so few cigarettes that I quit without even noticing (it helped that I had switched to a really weak cigarette and that I couldn't afford the cost of buying a lot of them).
embers | November 11, 03:52 CET
In a month, you won't smoke a ciggie within 25 feet of an entrance to any public place.
Draconian? Perhaps; but for once, I get to be the jack-booted thug.
Let's try that evil laugh on for size: Hee hee HEE MWAH-AH-AH HA HA HA! (Say, do these black leather jodhpurs make me look fat?)
bookrats | November 11, 04:16 CET
*idly wonders whether to join up with the Libertarians*
SoddingNancyTribe | November 11, 04:33 CET
I know several people who have smoked for years, "quitting" countless times (unsuccessfully), who wouldn't necessarily agree, although they might qualify my statement by saying their addiction was more psychologically-based. If you feel you can't function without something or need it to be "normal", it ceases to be recreational and becomes a dependency. Certainly for physical addiction, it would be hard to argue that nicotine withdrawal is anywhere near as rough as heroin withdrawal. Requiem for a Dream or Trainspotting, anyone?
Still, having once had a friend who was a heavy smoker (2 packs a day), I have to say the psychological addiction and emotional upheaval I witnessed was like nothing I'd ever seen before. When you set your bed on fire and burn down your apartment, and still can't kick the habit, that qualifies as pretty addicted in my book. (By way of comparison, my secretly heroin-addicted boss of some years ago died while I was in his employ -- but not of the drug; he fell down a flight of stairs after a night of perfectly legal drinking and broke his neck.) How's that for irony?
Congratulations to all you quitters! I can't imagine what you went through, but knowing that AH would consider kissing you now has to be some kind of consolation for the pain ;)
Wiseblood | November 11, 07:41 CET
It all boils down to public health. The freedom of choice argument for smoking doesn't fly with me. I am a music FIEND but I stopped going out to see live music because the clubs (some more than others) would turn into gas chambers by 10:30 Friday and Sat nights. I'd leave with a migraine that lasted the rest of the weekend. Some freedom. Having breathable air in Seattle clubs is going to be amazing. I can't wait to start seeing shows again. Up and coming bands are going to appreciate the larger crowds.
That said, I have NO problem with smokers starting private clubs if they want to. Just not right away. Let the former smoking clubs reap the financial rewards of a smokeless environment for a few years first so there's no temptation for them to "go private".
Hjermsted | November 11, 09:25 CET
And ditto for planes please! would it kill the airlines to have one smoking flight a week? especially over long distances like Australia to the Uk. Patches are no good cos they can give you some trippy nightmares
ladysorcha | November 11, 11:08 CET
You took the words right out of my stinky mouth :)
supersymetry | November 11, 17:01 CET
Simon | November 11, 17:21 CET
- companies would make more money due to fewer cigarette breaks.
- the NHS (or any state-funded healthcare) would have fewer lung cancer/ emphesyma/ etc patients to treat.
- life expectancy would increase so the government would have to pay out more in pensions.
I could list a load more factors suggesting that smoking bans would save money or cost money.
However the key point is that any ban really is horribly illiberal. The only people who should decide whether smoking should be allowed in pubs and clubs are the owners of those facilities. I don't smoke and prefer smoke-free environments, but it isn't a good idea for governments to ban things simply because the majority don't like them.
Jon | November 11, 18:33 CET
It didn't carry, but that it was even considered is borderline madness.
Chris inVirginia | November 11, 19:49 CET
lone fashionable wolf | November 11, 22:26 CET
Anyway, I was okay about people smoking in restaurants if there was a smoking section and a non-smoking section but the problem usually was that there really wasn't any way to actually keep the smoke out of the smoke free section if they were practically in the same room so it has been nicer to go out to eat and not have to deal with smoke at all. And businesses have been actually doing better business since the ban started. But, I don't see why there can't specifically be bars and restaurants that allow it and if one chooses to enter, smoker or not, it is their own choice. And, I also don't understand, if a pub or bar has the outdoor space, why they couldn't set up seating outside to allow for people who want to smoke to have a place to go.
Firefly Flanatic | November 11, 23:06 CET
I don't think there's anything wrong with the ban- public places are for everyone, why should one group be allowed to create a bad experience for everyone else? It's unpleasant, and passive smoking makes other people ill. It's alright to say it's illiberal, but what about all the other things people can't do in a private place, in order to protect the wellbeing of others? This is just another thing people shouldn't be allowed to hurt others by doing in a public place.
Silv | November 12, 06:33 CET
If the government wants to ban smoking in all of the buildings that it owns then that's not necessarily an unreasonable choice for it to make. However it should not be the role of governments to force people not to smoke.
Everyone will be in a minority in some aspect of their behaviour. It may be the healthy choice not to smoke but it is not healthy for the government to remove choices from its citizens.
Jon | November 12, 15:03 CET
I don't think there's anything wrong with the ban- public places are for everyone, why should one group be allowed to create a bad experience for everyone else? It's unpleasant, and passive smoking makes other people ill. It's alright to say it's illiberal, but what about all the other things people can't do in a private place, in order to protect the wellbeing of others? This is just another thing people shouldn't be allowed to hurt others by doing in a public place.
That's actually my argument for imposing massive restrictions on the sale of alcohol. It's a far bigger threat to society than smoking ever will be.
Simon | November 12, 15:06 CET
Oh yea...I do have Joss saying that into my video camera! After he told my youngest she should take up smoking to keep her voice raspy (she had a cold). Of course he was joking! I'd threatened him that I'd broadcast it online at the time (as a joke). It's very funny actually. Zeit, it's on the DVD I'll be sending you and Barest!
nixygirl | November 14, 04:54 CET
hallie12 | September 02, 11:44 CET