SMG Holds Another Grudge.
SMG is reprising her role in the follow up to The Grudge, aptly titled The Grudge 2. Filming starts in January for an October 06 release.
I guess the money was good.
December 05 2005
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.


Apocalypse | December 05, 20:47 CET
SoddingNancyTribe | December 05, 20:52 CET
Combine that with the fact the first film was as scary as Clifford (the dog, not Martin Short), and I'll probably skip this one in theaters.
Which is sad, since I was horror-"companion" enough to see Boogeyman and The Fog.
The Dark Shape | December 05, 20:53 CET
electricspacegirl | December 05, 20:57 CET
gossi | December 05, 20:59 CET
Personally, I really like 'The Grudge' (and 'Ju-On: The Grudge') in all its many variations. I would have been interested to see this without Gellar's involvement, but now it becomes another SMG film to look forward to. There can't be too many as far as I'm concerned.
alien lanes | December 05, 21:16 CET
Simon | December 05, 21:30 CET
ChosenOne5376 | December 05, 21:32 CET
Impossible | December 05, 21:33 CET
Rogue Slayer | December 05, 21:55 CET
Impossible | December 05, 21:59 CET
Chirp | December 05, 22:22 CET
And the second is going to belly flop into discount theaters. The Grudge made $110 million for one reason: The Ring. Considering Ring Two dropped to $76 million domestically (after the first grossed $130 million), there's no way The Grudge 2 makes more than $60 million, considering a general dislike from the public (I'm basing this on reactions of people I know, combined with the fact used DVD shops can't get rid of copies), and the fact it's going to open the same weekend as Saw 3.
The Dark Shape | December 05, 22:23 CET
The Dark Shape: The difference is that this film is going to have a very similar budget to the original (unlike what happened with The Ring, where both were much more costly). If it made $60 million domestically, it'd already be in the black and would presumably go on to make a very nice profit worldwide.
[ edited by Impossible on 2005-12-05 20:28 ]
Impossible | December 05, 22:25 CET
Razor | December 05, 22:31 CET
Regarding Gellar's alleged fast-track towards the "b-list" (which I take to be intended as a slight), perhaps we might consider the fact that if 'Serenity' had achieved a similar box office gross to 'The Grudge' a sequel would have been a certainty, something I am sure everybody here would welcome. It also seems a little premature to be writing off the prospects of 'The Grudge 2', given that the film hasn't even gone into production yet. I prefer to be optimistic.
alien lanes | December 05, 22:49 CET
I'll be optimistic when talented people are involved, or when said previous filmmakers learn to tell a story, not string together a series of half-baked scares.
[ edited by The Dark Shape on 2005-12-05 21:35 ]
The Dark Shape | December 05, 23:22 CET
Personally, I'm just not a huge one for sequels - the strength of the original idea rarely extends to "more of the same," unless the original idea was plotted as a multi-parter, a la LOTR. And the exceptions, such as Aliens (which I still find inferior to the original) tend only to prove the rule. But, again, looks unlikely that SMG is about to descend to the straight-to-video market on the strength of this one flick.
SoddingNancyTribe | December 05, 23:41 CET
Djungelurban | December 06, 00:21 CET
electricspacegirl | December 06, 00:27 CET
Calledon | December 06, 01:16 CET
I agree with your view of the Star Trek and Godfather sequels, but I still feel that is the extremely rare case, particularly, I think, when the original doesn't have the source material that those movies had.
SoddingNancyTribe | December 06, 01:39 CET
Djungelurban | December 06, 01:39 CET
[ edited by eddy on 2005-12-05 23:51 ]
eddy | December 06, 01:42 CET
gossi | December 06, 01:50 CET
Calledon | December 06, 02:03 CET
And, although I've probably taken up enough of everyone's time on this, it is a theme that tends to recur here, so: in general, let's please address the substance of each comment rather than the motivations we imagine lie behind it. In nearly every case, the comment speaks for itself. Thanks.
SoddingNancyTribe | December 06, 02:21 CET
Strange, don't think i've ever had reason to mention Die Hard here at Whedonesque before and yet today i've mentioned the movies twice in two seperate threads. Coincidence or fate telling me to get out my DVD boxset tonight as there is nothing else worth watching on telly? Hmmmmm! :)
WhedonTrivia | December 06, 02:27 CET
Now Superman II, there's a sequel that surpassed the original.
Simon | December 06, 02:32 CET
- Jeez! You give me this story and I'll have your baby!
- Not the kind of ride I'm looking for.
gossi | December 06, 02:45 CET
Thinking back to the original, she was very much regarded as the lead (and was certainly the focal point of the promotional campaign), but that didn't mean she had huge amounts of screentime. So even if she is regarded as the lead for this second film, that doesn't have to mean that her character is in it any more than 3 or 4 others. From what the writer has said, I also don't expect the whole mythology to be smeared or forgotten about. There could be flashbacks, her character could be in ghost form etc. They've had quite a while to think about the story they're going to tell in this film. So I'm hopeful it'll work out well.
Impossible | December 06, 03:20 CET
Gossi, have i been that transparent? ;)
WhedonTrivia | December 06, 03:31 CET
Untitled movie seems to be out early September in the US and Southland Tales is due September 15th in the UK and presumably earlier in the US
So at least 2 of her other movies are scheduled to open before TG2.
garda39 | December 06, 03:32 CET
"Who you gonna call?
-beat-
...That phrase won't ever be safe again, will it?"
Willowy | December 06, 03:35 CET
My comment was directed more towards the people behind the camera. But to be honest, Sarah was something of a non-factor for me in the first one. She didn't do badly and she didn't take away from the movie, but I wouldn't have noticed at all if someone else played the part, and I doubt The Grudge 2 would suffer much if she wasn't involved.
And since when does box office success equal a good movie? Friday the 13th grossed $80 million two and a half decades ago and held its own against The Empire Strikes Back, but it's still a terrible flick.
The Dark Shape | December 06, 03:45 CET
The fact that everything Gellar does, says, and is claimed to have done or said, seems to provoke opinion, one way or another, means something, I'm just not sure what that is.
alien lanes | December 06, 03:59 CET
Lioness | December 06, 04:16 CET
And, I'll hazard a guess and say that SMG provokes opinions on this board because we're "insiders," so to speak (although those opinions can get quite heated, to be sure). To the general public, I'm sure she provokes very little reaction whatsover. 'Cos, you know, Paris, Lindsay, Jessica (both of them), and Jennifer are waay more fascinating . . .
SoddingNancyTribe | December 06, 04:44 CET
I'm curious what story they're going to take. I've seen both Ju-On 1 and 2 and while 2 was okay, it certainly was a rerun of 1 in many ways. But the way the Grudge ended was so different from Ju On that a very different story would be a certainty. And I'm curious what will happen to Sarah's character now that she's the sole survivor between movies. I think the Ring 2's mistake was to stay too close to Ringu II which was in my opinion atrocious.
But it's possible that the japanese ghost movies have run their course in the US. No way of predicting. But if dreck like the Fog can still have an opening weekend like it did...
As for Sarah's choice, why wouldn't she sign on? She was instrumental in the making of the first, she enjoyed the experience and it was a success. If it can capitalize on the first the way that The Ring II, then it would make Sarah's face on the big screen yet a little more established to the mainstream. I say go for it. However I do share some people's reservation with sequels. The Godfather, Empire Strikes Back, Superman II, Aliens, X-Men II are definitely exaples in my book of successful sequels, but they are rare. (I only like Die Hard 1 I'm afraid. To each their own)
BUt discussions about what 'is' or 'isn't' scary are pointless. Scary, funny and sexy are reactions a person has or doesn't have. It can't be explained if it's not felt and it's pointless to 'blame' others for having one reaction or another. I think Freddy Krueger is funny. I think Friday the 13th movies are boring Halloween rip offs. I think Blair Witch and the Japanese horror movies I mentioned are nice and creepy. Plenty would disagree. To each their own.
It's like arguing over liking oysters or snails;-)
EdDantes | December 06, 04:49 CET
Oysters.No, snails.No, oysters. Wait, what were my choices again?Can't believe I forgot X-Men II. IMO, that was a lot better than the first. Oh, and Spidey II was also a superior sequel.
SoddingNancyTribe | December 06, 05:17 CET
Calledon | December 06, 05:33 CET
On the flipside of this debate, i would have to admit that the sequel is not always a good idea. I'm a great fan of the original Highlander movie and the television series that later followed but the movie sequel was an absolute disaster. In fact it is so badly regarded that it has gained itself a joke tagline amongst the fanbase: "Highlander 2: There should have been only one!".
WhedonTrivia | December 06, 06:00 CET
I hope it will be some kind of flashback, I don't want this to turn into The Ring 2 (I really loved the first one, but the second is so... bad).
Anyway, she must shoot 'The Air I Breath' in January too.
Angel TheVampire | December 06, 06:26 CET
(Heck, ebing that I am currently in the US I still feel lost in grocery stores and other settings in teh community).
Jonas | December 06, 06:47 CET
Hissssss!! Don't speak that name!! It' burnss usss! It burrnnsss!!
Besides, that movie was never made. There was only one Highlander movie. You see, after seeing that sequel, I went back in time and prevented them from ever starting on that atrocit-
*Ahem*. I may have said too much.
EdDantes | December 06, 07:13 CET
Willowy | December 06, 07:55 CET
Dude. Simon. We need to do that. Ghostbusters is in my top 20...I know the characters...I wrote a teleplay for a live-action pilot...we need to do this.
Ghostbusters in the Buffyverse? Tres bien!!!
UnpluggedCrazy | December 06, 08:01 CET
Ahh well, good to see sarahs doing well. Cant wait for Southland Tales!
BD | December 06, 11:40 CET
For those wanting Southland Tales news, a transcript of the latest Richard Kelly interview is here.
[ edited by dreamlogic on 2005-12-06 10:51 ]
dreamlogic | December 06, 12:45 CET
Also, while some sequels are not automatically inferior to the original, they usually are caught up in a game of diminishing returns. Just a rule of thumb, like translating a book to the screen or re-making a foreign movie, a sequel usually doesn't have the power of the original.
dottikin | December 06, 13:11 CET
Oh, how we wish this was true! That movie came very close to destroying the entire concept of Highlander with it's strange idea that the Immortals were aliens from another world and that the concept of "there can be only one" was only the case unless you happened to call out the name of an old friend, bringing them back from the dead in a bolt of lightning. Kind of defeats the entire point of the Gathering, doesn't it!
Anyway, Highlander 5 is currently in production (with two more promised as part of a new trilogy) and, believe it or not, is threatening to actually be the first truly good Highlander sequel. Time will tell.
WhedonTrivia | December 06, 15:03 CET
WhoIsOmega? | December 06, 17:47 CET
While it's certainly true that nobody else has ever survived long-term, they've certainly had encounters with the curse and lived. Sarah's character in the first film had numerous encounters, including in the shower, on the bus, in the house while it was burning; all before what we were presumably supposed to assume was the final encounter. But if it turns out that that wasn't the final encounter for whatever reason, then there's no reason why her death couldn't have been delayed without ruining the mythology.
[ edited by Impossible on 2005-12-06 18:36 ]
Impossible | December 06, 19:51 CET
BD | December 07, 00:17 CET
Sigh....now I have to kill you all....
Yeah, that was the movie that taught me that the pain stops if you bang your head on the table a bunch of times in a row. Blessed oblivion...
5 in production? New trilogy?? I wish I could say that sounds like good news.
I suppose it's not entirely completely impossible but they've said that about the last three and I'm still hurtin'. And could they come up with something other than 'oh there's yet ANOTHER Gathering, and there is some evil immortal who's REALLY the strongest ever and we sure hope he don't win!' for once?
Yeah we never saw her die. But I do hope they do something more with it than just another string of people getting killed by the curse. It was fine for the first one but I felt it started to wear thin in Ju On II. Maybe some reason why Sarah survived? As long as she's not just cameoing as 'ghost of previous victim'. Cuz that would be on the lame end of things.
EdDantes | December 07, 09:53 CET
Well the good news about this one is that it's been put entirely in the hands of those that made all the best episodes of the television series so good, not to mention the fact the Dimension is no longer pulling the strings so they actually have a semi-decent budget to work with. The fourth movie, Endgame, had the potential to be so damn good and yet those behind the scenes with the tight purse strings made the intended story almost impossible to tell. That shouldn't be the case this time. Add the fact that Joe Dawson and Methos will actually be allowed to play major roles in this one, as they should have in Endgame, and you just might see the first successful Highlander movie since the original.
I won't put any of the story information here for fear of spoiling anyone that doesn't want to know but if you are interested in finding out a little about the general plot for the movie (currently called The Source) then have a look at Highlander Worldwide. It's got a lot of imformation there and a link to the official movie site.
WhedonTrivia | December 07, 18:17 CET