January 04 2006
Vampire Angel Debut.
The final plush in the Angel puppet line.
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.
This site will work and look better in a browser that supports web standards, but it is accessible to any browser or Internet device.

Simon | January 04, 19:05 CET
Rogue Slayer | January 04, 19:16 CET
Willowy | January 04, 19:16 CET
Lioness | January 04, 20:03 CET
Angel_1 | January 04, 20:06 CET
Hjermsted | January 04, 20:33 CET
Lizz2727 | January 04, 20:34 CET
MindPieces | January 04, 21:15 CET
Madhatter | January 04, 21:20 CET
Does anyone know what the production problem was? It can't be that hard to make a puppet look like a puppet...
I can't speak for certain but I was discussing this on some website around the time the first version was announced/released when pupeteer posted and pretty much said that puppets, good high quality puppets like they use on the Muppets are actually quite expensive... somewhere in the $1000-1500 range if I remember correctly... which is unlikely (me remembering correctly I mean.) so feel free to correct me.
war_machine | January 04, 21:34 CET
Chris inVirginia | January 04, 21:35 CET
It's quite easy to make the original puppet look more like the Smile Time puppet by rounding out the chin with a well-placed stitch or two.
I think I'll just make wee fangs for my original puppet. As Lioness says, he's quite easy to get attached to.
Ruadh | January 04, 22:11 CET
DarenG | January 04, 22:20 CET
Anyway, when I was at the Two By Two convention someone there had actually made their own puppet Angel that looked much better than the official reproductions. And I remember seeing in the B/A magazine a photo of a convention where someone had made awesome Angel and Lorne puppets, perhaps before the official one came out. I mean if amateurs can make great reproductions why can't a professional company who wants to sell the things?
Razor | January 04, 22:52 CET
Honestly I think it looks pretty good. Especially compared to the other two which I agree are awful.
That is the reason I ordered this one. It really is the best of the lot. The chin still is too narrow but other than that its...well...Cute!
Xane | January 04, 23:35 CET
I swear i could design a better version myself. Y'know, if i had the materials ... and the money ... and the time ...
Buffysmglover | January 05, 00:38 CET
Madhatter | January 05, 00:40 CET
doodles | January 05, 02:56 CET
Lunakitty | January 05, 03:06 CET
Simon | January 05, 03:08 CET
If I can make something that looks at least a little like the little fella then so can you. Have a look see....
The sad thing is I would have bought one too if it had actually looked like him.
*ETA* Sorry I still can't work out to make live links here. sigh.
sueworld2003 | January 05, 03:26 CET
wrikiwood | January 05, 04:03 CET
The trick? Copy this pattern exactly, but use these bracket-thingys: < > in place of the [ ] in the example:
[a href="http://tinypic.com/jqgvif"]Here's my work[/a].
Just don't forget the space in between a and href, and the quotation marks.
Your work is exceptional, by the way. :)
SoddingNancyTribe | January 05, 04:09 CET
I really wanted a larger version though and so when I first heard about DST getting the license to make them I was expecting great things. *Sigh* Was I dissapointed.
sueworld2003 | January 05, 04:40 CET
spikeylover | January 05, 06:08 CET
[ edited by annieb on 2006-01-05 04:15 ]
annieb | January 05, 06:15 CET
(I believe you mean Henson.)
Ginny | January 05, 07:38 CET
Hanson puppets!?! Aaaaaargh!!! :p
Buffysmglover | January 05, 13:42 CET