January 13 2006
Why's it so hard to get 'Buffy' on my iPod?
As this CNET article points out, "Buying an iPod is easy. Filling it with video turns out to be much more difficult."
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.


Am I the only one that thinks that digital copywrite is needlessly complex and often makes things that should be legitimate fair use illegal? To me it seems perfectly fine to be able to rip your own DVDs that you purchased for viewing on an iPod or similar device.
Interesting note: if they did decide to release Buffy episodes at $2 per download on iTunes, a full season of 22 episodes would come to $44.00. In the end you would be paying roughly the same price for the DVD season set for very low-res digital downloads of the episodes. I don't think that $2 is an unreasonable price... maybe we're just incredibly lucky with how inexpensive our season sets are! (And even more so with the new complete collection)
[ edited by AnotherFireflyfan on 2006-01-13 15:23 ]
AnotherFireflyfan | January 13, 17:19 CET
Just wonderin'.
: )
[ edited by AmazonGirl on 2006-01-13 15:34 ]
AmazonGirl | January 13, 17:32 CET
I currently have every episode of Firefly, the second season of Veronica Mars, the second season of Battlestar Galactica, Serenity, the Matrix, and all the Star Wars movies on my iPod, plus about 200 CDs, and all my digital pictures from the last 4 years, and I've only used about half the space available.
I love being able to show people Firefly and Serenity anytime I want!
Kelric | January 13, 17:37 CET
Cause lord knows we can't spend a minute away from a tv screen. ;-)
AnotherFireflyfan | January 13, 17:38 CET
I thought the same thing too until I actually saw something playing on an iPod. The screen looks amazing. It's much more watchable than I ever though. I use it mostly when I'm in the car/bus (and others are driving), in waiting rooms, at the gym, etc.
Kelric | January 13, 17:40 CET
Cause lord knows we can't spend a minute away from a tv screen. ;-)
Bigger TVs, smaller TVs, TVs everywhere...always on...
Blipverts!!
Is it me? Or is there something vaguely disturbing about that?
The somnambulant public
always watchingaddicted to the puppet theatre.Me? If I'm somewhere waiting, I read a book. Or knit. Or read and knit.
I'll have to admit, sometimes on the treadmill I try to find a movie on the TV set, but fer cryin' out loud, not all the time.
It's like little kids I see out with their parents. Kids got their nose buried in a vid game or something, rather than interacting with their surroundings.
AmazonGirl | January 13, 17:57 CET
chickenbird | January 13, 18:56 CET
(Edited to capitalize letters)
[ edited by SoddingNancyTribe on 2006-01-13 19:40 ]
Drusillaloveskyo | January 13, 20:15 CET
However, it is a good idea to diversify your entertainment intake, and expose yourself to different things.
AnotherFireflyfan | January 13, 20:46 CET
Anyone wanna help a girl out?
Rogue | January 13, 21:00 CET
It's not that I railing against TV. And I love new media and technology. I just feel like there's something unhealthy about needing to be...entertained...all the time.
When you can't go anywhere or do anything without being attached to a media nipple--a flickering screen or someone talking/singing/whatever in your ears--there's something wrong.
iPods are cute.
But it seems that we're being "entertained" to sleep.
Just my humble opine.
AmazonGirl | January 13, 21:39 CET
Mort | January 13, 22:26 CET
Which is another argument, being the Archos is a much better product than the ipod IMHO. No need for itunes or any other program, just plug it in via usb and it becomes an external hard drive you can just drop your movies, music, files, etc. onto. I've got one and it's uses are endless, and it's easy to use. All the Firefly eps are loaded and ready for viewing, along with a few hundred cd's. Not to mention the screen is about twice the size.
danregal | January 13, 22:43 CET
redfern | January 13, 23:08 CET
Anusien | January 14, 03:34 CET
There's quite a good guide here as well, for both Windows and Mac users, for getting video onto the iPod.
VirtualWolf | January 14, 05:39 CET
Plus you know, it's quicker to rip. Which, I'm gonna echo two people above, I'd also recommend HandBrake for if you have a Mac. Since I've been editing and grabbing just parts and not the whole disc, I've also been using QuickTime Pro to crop and export the video for the iPod (since it has a setting just for that, which works great).
Of course, if you aren't on a Mac or don't want to buy QT Pro, my advice won't do one much good.
Mike_S | January 14, 07:15 CET
Of course having a video screen is cool and could prove useful, but I don't see the need to pay to buy tiny versions of programmes I already own. That's why I think it would make more sense for you to be able to conveniently copy DVDs you already own to your iPod. I know with music albums you are allowed to copy them for your own private use, on a CD or to an mp3 player, so why shouldn't the same apply to films on an iPod?
I think that would actually act as more as an incentive instead of people knowing they are going to have to pay even more to watch TV programs or films on a very small screen. The whole UMD thing is completely alien to me- they are almost the same price as a full DVD when you can only watch them on a PSP screen which has nowhere near the same level of detail or cinematic sound or anything.
Do you have to pay for music videos for iPods? I certainly don't think you should. The whole idea of them is to promote the music, so I think having free music videos on your iPod would probably increase the chances of you buying the artist's albums.
I do think it would be neat to have an iPod video if you could transfer DVDs to them easily, but at the moment I don't want one. I can't imagine I would use it that often, or be travelling enough to justify watching films on it.
Razor | January 14, 19:16 CET