IMDb has Episode Guides!
The Internet Movie Database's large resource irons out the difficulty in locating actor's guest appearances into easy-to-read episode guides. For example, Buffy (main link), Angel, and Firefly.
Rather than dealing with the frustrating TV.com (while lamenting the loss of TVtome.com) or wondering if the Wikipedia has a suitable episode guide from less-popular series, the IMDb provides a suitable alternative.
Each episode has its own page (e.g. The Body), which lists guest cast - and will specify which regulars actually appeared in that ep (e.g. James Marsters wasn't in The Body, so I've alerted the IMDb to that fact)
Actors pages list invidual series episodes they've guest starred in - so you can quickly see which episodes of "Veronica Mars" Alyson Hannigan was in - or "Angel" or "That 70s Show" or "Picket Fences"
January 29 2006
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.


KernelM | January 29, 08:42 CET
rabid | January 29, 08:47 CET
KernelM | January 29, 08:52 CET
I also hate how guest star credits are up with the regular credits. JM's smallville guest star credits beside his Buffy regular credit? Yuck!
[ edited by eddy on 2006-01-29 06:54 ]
eddy | January 29, 08:52 CET
So you go to Wenworth Miller's page and it's clearly listed!
I also hate how guest star credits are up with the regular credits. JM's smallville guest star credits beside his Buffy regular credit? Yuck!
Why should they be listed separately?
I have discovered one problem with this change - for example, on David Boreanaz's page, his credit for "Buffy" is listed more recently because he guest starred on eps of "Buffy" after "Angel" began! Weird.
[ edited by Keith G on 2006-01-29 07:28 ]
crossoverman | January 29, 09:24 CET
btw: another benefit that the per-episode pages brings us is that they list the actual director/writers for that episode.
ironclad | January 29, 09:29 CET
Why should they be listed separately? Because it was helpful to know what was a regular role and what was a guest star role for actors. The filmographies are all cluttered now.
[ edited by eddy on 2006-01-29 07:40 ]
eddy | January 29, 09:39 CET
daedreams | January 29, 09:53 CET
IMDb has always been good at bringing up like-names, punch in "Keith Szaer" gives you a list of 20 names with Keith Szarabajka at the top!
Because it was helpful to know what was a regular role and what was a guest star role for actors. The filmographies are all cluttered now.
It isn't perfect, I agree. But IMDb is likely to iron out any problems. Plus it seems fairly clear the difference between regular work and guest appearances (except in the case of someone like DB who both starred on Buffy and guest starred in it later - but for the majority of actors that isn't a problem).
crossoverman | January 29, 10:01 CET
[ edited by billz on 2006-01-29 08:35 ]
billz | January 29, 10:31 CET
Okay, and getting back on topic here...
Yeah, the new system they have is a little weird, I guess it'll take some getting used to?
Emma Frost | January 29, 10:57 CET
Thanks for passing the news along.
k8cre8 | January 29, 11:13 CET
bovik | January 29, 12:41 CET
It was cool going into Stephanie Romanov's page and seeing a long list of Angel appearences.... now there's only 5 :(
aapac | January 29, 12:44 CET
You must have missed the "(30 more)" notation under that, which links to Stephanie's TV Episode Filmography by Series page.
crossoverman | January 29, 13:08 CET
Saje | January 29, 13:52 CET
Celebithil | January 29, 14:00 CET
Simon | January 29, 14:03 CET
Buffyology, Buffy vs Angel and the Buffyverse Dialogue Database are all also fantastic resources for Buffy and Angel fans.
Buffysmglover | January 29, 18:19 CET
zz9 | January 29, 20:11 CET
feelinglistless | January 29, 20:28 CET
flightofserenity | January 29, 22:13 CET
Mort | January 30, 02:19 CET
The only thing that bothers me about tv.com is the fact thaty they number the episodes overall and not by season. (i.e. instead of being season 5 episode 8 I get episode 102.)
war_machine | January 30, 16:53 CET
Well the bandwidth issue is due to the fact they've filled the site with video and photos and flash animation and every whiz-bang feature under the sun that even my hardy broadband connection takes exception to. It would be one thing if TV.com was in competition with TVtome, but they bought it and ruined it.
Why take a valuable resource and then make it less valuable? Why clutter it up with stuff that TVtome wasn't known for and didn't need to be saddled with?
crossoverman | January 31, 10:16 CET
I found another use for the page though - if you don't know the episode, but you know the character name, you can find both on the Episodes Cast page. Not so easy elsewhere.
ironclad | February 05, 13:55 CET